Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Download PDF

Effect of sustained virological response after direct-acting antivirals on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV infection

The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine volume 34, Article number: 18 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the therapy of HCV infection with higher sustained virological response (SVR) rates. Fibrosis regression after achieving SVR to DAA remains to be evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients. One of the main inquiries here is what occurs with liver fibrosis after achieving a SVR, albeit the current DAA was not intended to be antifibrotic. Liver biopsy was replaced by various non-invasive methods, like FIB4 score and fibroscan. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of SVR following DAAs on liver fibrosis in chronic HCV patients.

Results

Five hundred of 1170 F4 treated patients (42.7%) improved and became 190 F3, 90 F2, and 220 F1. Also, 40 of 60 F3 patients improved and became 10 F2 and 30 F1. Also, 350 of 1230 treated patients (28.4%) transited from significant fibrosis (≥F3) to non-significant fibrosis (≤F2). There was a significant improvement of FIB-4 (p<0.001) in the improved group after DAAs were proved by liver stiffness measurement.

Conclusion

Treatment of chronic HCV with DAAs is associated with regression of liver fibrosis as about 28% of patients improved from significant fibrosis (≥F3) to non-significant fibrosis (≤F2) after treatment.

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the major causes of liver cirrhosis worldwide [1]. The number of individuals with chronic HCV all over the world is approximately 185 million [2].

In the last few years, antiviral therapy for HCV has been rapidly evolving with the introduction and proliferation of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies. They revolutionized the therapy of HCV infection with higher efficacy and sustained virological response (SVR) rates, shortened and simplified regimens, and minimal adverse effects [3]. However, achieving sustained SVR does not instantly reverse HCV-related hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Reversion of hepatic fibrosis has been an important point of exploration and study among liver diseases experts for several decades. Previous studies on the impact of interferon-based HCV therapy on hepatic fibrosis have shown regression of fibrosis over periods of up to 48 months in some patients after therapy [4,5,6].

Nowadays, liver stiffness assessment using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) has superseded liver biopsy as a favored non-invasive modality7. Moreover, the value of TE has been assessed in checking the progression of fibrosis in the set of HCV relapses after liver transplantation [7].

Numerous noninvasive laboratory scores such as APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 have been verified to be precise in chronic liver disease staging before antiviral treatment and assessing hepatic fibrosis in HCV patients. Furthermore, they have been useful for follow-up of patients with chronic HCV and to evaluate the impact of DAA therapy [8, 9].

The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of SVR following DAAs on liver fibrosis in chronic HCV patients.

Methods

Study design

This is a prospective study that was conducted on patients attending to the Hepatology Clinics, Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University,, Egypt, for follow-up of chronic HCV infection during the period from January 2019 to January 2021.

Patients

Our study was conducted on 1380 chronic HCV patients; 1230 patients received DAAs and 150 patients did not receive treatment on their request (control group). We included patients who are 16 years or older with HCV who are a candidate for DAAs. Patients with radiologically suspected focal lesions either malignant or not, coinfection with other viruses, presence of decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh more than 7), and organ failure were excluded from the study. Chronic HCV infection was diagnosed by positive RT-PCR RNA HCV ± abnormal liver function tests and the presence of stigmata of chronic liver disease. HCV RNA was quantified by real-time PCR assay (COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan 48, Roche Molecular Diagnostics). HCV genotype was detected by Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (LiPA-Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).

Patients evaluation

Before the start of antiviral treatment, all patients were subjected to full history and clinical assessment.

Laboratory assessment

Laboratory tests were done as complete blood count, liver enzymes aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT, AST), serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, α fetoprotein, and INR.

Transient elastography

The liver stiffness of the patients was assessed via Fibroscan (Echosens, Paris, France). For staging, the subsequent cutoff values were used: were F1 (>4.8 kPa), F2 (>8.3 kPa), F3 (>10.1 kPa), and F4 (>13.4 kPa) [10]. Liver stiffness was considered as the median of all valid measurements. For high BMI (≥30 kg/m2), examination with the XL probe, with two experienced operators, was done. Transient elastography was done before and immediately after treatment and after 48 weeks.

FIB-4 was calculated [age (years) × AST (IU/l)/(platelet count (109/l)× √ALT (IU/l))] for all patients. Fibrosis is considered to be significant if ≥ F3 and non-significant fibrosis if ≤ F2. If fibrosis decreases by only one stage it is considered as fibrosis regression and stationary fibrosis if there is no change in the fibrosis stage.

All patients were evaluated by all the previous parameters before treatment and immediately after treatment, then after 12–48 weeks.

Definitions

Fibrosis regression: decrease liver fibrosis by one or more stages as F4 to < F3.

Fibrosis progression: increase liver fibrosis by one or more stages as F3 to > F4.

Stationary course: No change in liver fibrosis stage.

Treatment protocols

At the Virology unit, Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University, Egypt, all patients were evaluated for anti-HCV treatment. The DAAs regimens were used according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Control of Viral Hepatitis (NCCVH) in Egypt. We treated the patients with the following combinations: SOF plus DCV, SOF/DCV/RBV, SOF/RBV, LDV/SOF, and interferon-based.

Statistical analysis and data interpretation

Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Qualitative data were described using numbers and percentages. Quantitative data were described using median (minimum and maximum) and interquartile range for non-parametric data and mean, standard deviation for parametric data after testing normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 0.05 level. Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Monte Carlo test were used for comparison of 2 or more groups for qualitative variables. Stewart–Maxwell test was used to compare follow-up periods for categorical variables with more than 2 categories. Student’s t test was used to compare 2 independent groups, paired t test and repeated measures ANOVA, to compare between studied periods with post hoc Tukey test for parametric variables. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare 2 independent groups, Wilcoxon signed rank test and Friedman test were used to compare studied periods for non-parametric variables.

Results

The current study was conducted on 1380 chronic HCV patients, with mean age of 56.39 ± 7.81 years, 770 females and 610 males. DM was found in 27.1% and HTN in 13.6% of patients (Table 1). The common regimen used in HCV treatment was SOF/DCV/RBV in 920 patients.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied patients
Full size table

There was a significant improvement of FIB-4 (p<0.001) in the improved group after DAAs proved by liver stiffness measurement. Also, there was significant improvement after DAAs as regard AST, s. bilirubin, s. albumin, and creatinine (p<0.001, 0.01, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively) (Table 2).

Table 2 Radiographic and laboratory results pre and post treatment among studied cases
Full size table

Table 3 compares the radiographic and laboratory results between the control group and interventional arm where there was a significant improvement in the radiographic, laboratory, and endoscopic parameters of the treated patients.

Table 3 Comparison of radiographic and laboratory results between control and interventional arm
Full size table

The study included 150 cirrhotic patients (F4 by fibroscan), treated group (1170 F4 and 6 F3). After treatment, 500 of 1170 F4 patients (42.7%) improved and became 190 F3, 90 F2, and 220 F1. Also, 40 of 60 F3 patients improved and became 10 F2 and 30 F1. After treatment 350 of 1230 treated patients (28.4%) transited from significant fibrosis (≥F3) to non-significant fibrosis (≤F2). Moreover, 840 of 1230 treated patients (68.3%) showed a reduction in liver stiffness ≥ 30% from their baseline by fibroscan.

In Table 4, we compared the radiographic and laboratory results between controls, improved, and non-improved cases. We found that non-improved cases were older, with a high incidence of DM, and have lower baseline ALT, AST, serum albumin, platelets, and high bilirubin than the improved cases.

Table 4 Comparison of radiographic and laboratory results between controls, improved and non-improved cases
Full size table

Discussion

HCV is a worldwide prevalent virus and a major cause of death and morbidity. Introduction of DAAs has resulted in a substantial breakthrough in HCV treatments as they can achieve SVR in almost 100% of patients with chronic hepatitis C; however, the ultimate goal of HCV treatments is to prevent cirrhosis development and its sequels [11].

Our study was conducted on 1380 chronic HCV patients with mean age 56.39 ± 7.81 years, 770 females and 610 males. The common regimen used in HCV treatment was SOF/DCV/RBV (920 patients).

In our study, 500 of 1170 F4 treated patients (42.7%) improved and became 190 F3, 90 F2, and 220 F1. Also, 40 of 60 F3 patients improved and became 10 F2 and 30 F1. After treatment 350 of the treated patients (28.4%) transited from significant fibrosis (≥F3) to non-significant fibrosis (≤F2). Also, There was a significant improvement of FIB-4 (p<0.001) in the improved group after DAAs proved by liver stiffness measurement.

Similar results were observed by Pietsch et al. [12] who evaluated liver stiffness changes (for 96 weeks) using transient elastography in only 143 chronic HCV patients with achieved SVR following DAAs. There was a significant overall long-term improvement of liver stiffness values in all patients in their study although they have not clarified the median of transient elastography changes. Interestingly, in another study of 260 patients with chronic HCV, Lledó et al. reported that 40% of patients showed significant fibrosis regression. Furthermore, this fibrosis regression was more obvious in patients who have advanced fibrosis at baseline [13].

Also, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Singh et al revised 11 studies evaluating LSM before and after DAAs demonstrated a rapid regression in liver stiffness during DAAs treatment and a slower but steady regression after treatment as LSM declined by 2.4 kPa at the end of treatment, by 3.1 kPa 4-24 weeks after treatment, by 3.2 kPa 24–48 weeks after treatment, and by 4.1 kPa > 12 months after treatment. The pooled regression in liver fibrosis in these studies may be related to the design of these studies as the majority of those studies were retrospective and included a small number of patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis [14].

The chance for reversion of liver fibrosis is more pronounced in patients with early cirrhosis because the persistence of necro-inflammatory activity in milder forms of chronic liver disease may take up to 15–30 years before achieving real significant degrees of scarring in the liver [15]. Reversion of early fibrosis is easier than older fibrosis, which becomes more stabilized progressively via collagen crosslinking by tissue transglutaminase that makes fibers less sensitive to degrading enzymes [16]. Septal fibrosis in early-stage concomitant with earlier stages of neo-angiogenesis; is more easily broken down due to its lower degree of maturity of the vessels [17].

Moreover, 840 of the treated patients (68.3%) in our study showed a reduction in liver stiffness ≥ 30% from their baseline by fibroscan. Whereas, Chan and colleagues [18] found that only 34 of 70 patients (48.6%) met 30% improvement in liver stiffness measurement score.

Our study also showed that regression of LSM using transient elastography was also evident by improvement of FIB-4 score. Similarly, several previous studies have shown this concordance between the regression of LSM by elastography and improvement of FIB-4 score in chronic HCV patients after DAA therapy [19,20,21]. From these findings, we could conclude that the combination of these non-invasive scores with transient elastography could be a good tool for the assessment of liver fibrosis.

Huang et al. [22] analyzed 40 paired liver biopsies of chronic hepatitis C patients before and after DAAs therapy and demonstrated significant improvement of liver inflammation and fibrosis after SVR. Furthermore, LSM by transient elastography, APRI, and FIB-4 declined significantly after SVR and predicted fibrosis well even after SVR by DAAs.

In our study, we found that non-improved cases were older, with a high incidence of DM, have lower baseline ALT, AST, serum albumin, platelets, and high bilirubin than the improved cases. Liver fibrosis is an active process comprising chronic stimulation of wound healing reaction as a response to repeated liver injury, leading to fibrillar extracellular matrix deposition in the liver and finally, liver cirrhosis if the cause of injury is not removed. Adipokines have been demonstrated to be incorporated in different obesity-related diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. Gathering data reveal that insulin resistance and obesity are linked to the more severe and quicker progression of the fibrosis in different chronic liver diseases [23]. In addition to low baseline ALT, AST before treatment indicates a low process of necroinflammation and the presence of significant fibrosis.

Our study may be limited by the lack of concomitant histopathological examination through liver biopsy; however, according to the American Association For Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the standard liver biopsy had been replaced by the non-invasive testing for liver fibrosis stages evaluation. Both transient elastography and non-invasive markers showed a high diagnostic value and their combination could be used to diagnose or exclude cirrhosis [24].

Conclusions

We concluded that treatment of chronic HCV with DAAs is associated with regression of liver fibrosis as about 28% of patients improved from significant fibrosis (≥F3) to non-significant fibrosis (≤F2) after treatment and about 68% showed a reduction in LSM ≥ 30% from their baseline.

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed during the study are included in this published article are readily available with the corresponding author for share on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

DAAs:

Direct-acting antiviral agents

SVR:

Sustained virologic response

VCTE:

Vibration controlled transient elastography

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

NCCVH:

National Committee for Control of Viral Hepatitis

RBV:

Ribavirin

SOF:

Sofosbuvir

LDV:

Ledipasvir

DCV:

Daclatasvir

AASLD:

American Association For Study of Liver Diseases

References

  1. Lavanchy D (2011) Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clin Microbiol Infect 17(2):107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Messina JP, Humphreys I, Flaxman A et al (2015) Global distribution and prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology 61(1):77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwon JH, Yoo SH, Nam SW et al (2019) Clinical outcomes after the introduction of direct antiviral agents for patients infected with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus depending on the regimens: A multicenter study in Korea. J Med Virol 91(6):1104–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stasi C, Arena U, Zignego AL et al (2013) Longitudinal assessment of liver stiffness in patients undergoing antiviral treatment for hepatitis C. Dig Liver Dis 45(10):840–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez SM, Foucher J, Combis J-M et al (2012) Longitudinal liver stiffness assessment in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing antiviral therapy. PLoS One 7(10):e47715-e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JH, Kim MN, Han K-H, Kim SU (2014) Clinical application of transient elastography in patients with chronic viral hepatitis receiving antiviral treatment. Liver Int 35(4):1103–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrión JA, Torres F, Crespo G et al (2009) Liver stiffness identifies two different patterns of fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation. Hepatology 51(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonnard P, Elsharkawy A, Zalata K et al (2014) Comparison of liver biopsy and noninvasive techniques for liver fibrosis assessment in patients infected with HCV-genotype 4 in Egypt. J Viral Hepat 22(3):245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yosry A, Fouad R, Alem SA et al (2016) FibroScan, APRI, FIB4, and GUCI: Role in prediction of fibrosis and response to therapy in Egyptian patients with HCV infection. Arab J Gastroenterol 17(2):78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdelsameea E, Alsebaey A, Abdel-Razek W et al (2020) Elastography and serum markers of fibrosis versus liver biopsy in 1270 Egyptian patients with hepatitis C. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32(12):1553–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Enomoto M, Kawada N (2020) The Moral of Hepatic Fibrosis: Don’t Always Believe Noninvasive Fibrosis Measurements. Dig Dis Sci 65(5):1293–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pietsch V, Deterding K, Attia D et al (2018) Long-term changes in liver elasticity in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with sustained virologic response after treatment with direct-acting antivirals. United European Gastroenterol J 6(8):1188–1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lledó GM, Carrasco I, Benítez-Gutiérrez LM et al (2018) Regression of liver fibrosis after curing chronic hepatitis C with oral antivirals in patients with and without HIV coinfection. AIDS 32(16):2347–2352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh S, Facciorusso A, Loomba R, Falck-Ytter YTJCG, Hepatology. (2018) Magnitude and kinetics of decrease in liver stiffness after antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(1):27–38 e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinzani M (2004) Therapies for hepatic fibrosis: real hope or just academic exercise? Dig Liver Dis 36(11):714–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman SL (2003) Liver fibrosis–from bench to bedside. J Hepatol 38:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carmeliet P (2003) Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med 9(6):653–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan J, Gogela N, Zheng H et al (2018) Direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic HCV infection results in liver stiffness regression over 12 months post-treatment. Dig Dis Sci 63(2):486–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruno G, Dell’Acqua R, Milano E, Fabrizio C, Milella MJH (2016) Early regression of liver fibrosis in HCV infected patients with or without HIV infection after treatment with DAAs. Hepatology 64:326A

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen S-H, Lai H-C, Chiang I-P et al (2018) Changes in liver stiffness measurement using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography after antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. PLoS One 13(1):e0190455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shiha G, Soliman R, Mikhail N, Ibrahim A, Serwah AH, Khattab MJG (2020) Changes in hepatic fibrosis stages after achieving SVR following direct-acting anti-viral treatment: a prospective study. GastroHep 2(1):39–48

  22. Huang R, Rao H, Yang M et al (2020) Noninvasive Measurements Predict Liver Fibrosis Well in Hepatitis C Virus Patients After Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy. Dig Dis Sci 65(5):1491–1500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bertolani C, Marra F (2008) The role of adipokines in liver fibrosis. Pathophysiology 15(2):91–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Connolly JC, Lim JK (2019) Non-invasive Fibrosis Assessment of Patients with Hepatitis C: Application of Society Guidelines to Clinical Practice. Curr Hepatol Rep 18(2):249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to our colleagues in the hepato-gastroenterology and hematology departments, Mansoura University. We are also thankful for our patients for their contribution and trust.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatology & Gastroenterology unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Ramy H. Agwa, Mohamed H. Elgazzar, Islam A. El-Zayyadi, Ahmed M. Saed & Ahmed Saleh

  2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Haematology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Mayada A. Ghannam

Authors
  1. Ramy H. Agwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed H. Elgazzar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Islam A. El-Zayyadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed M. Saed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mayada A. Ghannam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ahmed Saleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The protocol of the study, study design, methodology, follow-up of the patients, collecting data, data analysis, and writing - original draft preparation: RA, ME, and IE; Lab investigation: MG; Writing - review and editing: AS and AS. Supervision: AS. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Saleh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by the ethics committee of our university (Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Institutional Review Board and has been performed following the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed written consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Code number: R.21.03.1252.

Consent for publication

NA.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agwa, R.H., Elgazzar, M.H., El-Zayyadi, I.A. et al. Effect of sustained virological response after direct-acting antivirals on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV infection. Egypt J Intern Med 34, 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-022-00111-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-022-00111-1

Keywords