Skip to main content

Unique role of admission hyperglycemia on myocardial infarction size and area at risk following an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract

Background

Hyperglycemia can adversely affect patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The majority of the studies had investigated the impact of admission hyperglycemia (AH) on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality while, in ours, we entailed its impact on final infarction size (FIS) and more interestingly, on the area at risk (AAR), both were estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

Results

AH showed significant positive correlations to FIS and AAR. Moreover, AH group had higher summation of ST segment elevation (sum STE), more maximum ST segment elevation (max STE), higher echocardiographic wall motion score index (WMSI), higher CMR estimated WMSI, and lower segmental ejection fraction (EF). Multivariate analysis showed that AH was independently associated with increased FIS.

Conclusion

Current study showed an association between AH and large FIS in STEMI patients.

Background

Accounting for more than 15 million deaths annually, cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of death worldwide [1]. In the last decade, the mortality rates after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) showed an obvious decline which is explained by the expanded use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), fibrinolytic therapies, and updated antithrombotics [1]. But, in Egypt, as well as low- and middle-income countries, mortality and cardiovascular events are still relatively high with the comparable burden with that of infectious diseases and other non-communicable diseases, despite improvement in therapeutic and interventional therapy [1].

Admission hyperglycemia (AH) has been determined to inversely affect short- and long-term prognosis in patients with STEMI regardless of their diabetic state [2].

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the traditional imaging tool utilized to measure FIS, but it has a limited spatial resolution, and carry the risk of radiation [3]. CMR is a relatively new cardiac imaging modality that can assess changes in cardiac contractile function, metabolic activity, and membrane integrity. Furthermore, CMR has a high spatial and temporal resolution which facilitates accurate assessment of cardiovascular structures. By the addition of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with CMR, transmural extension and scar tissues can be estimated [4].

A few data about the sequelae of AH on FIS after acute STEMI patients are present and nearly no available data about the relation between AH and area at risk, and the objective of the current study was to investigate the relationship between admission blood glucose and myocardial FIS and AAR after reperfusion in STEMI patients by using CMR.

Methods

Study population

Forty-three patients who were presented with their first acute STEMI and underwent successful reperfusion, in a period less than 12 h from onset of symptoms, were included. They were selected from the Critical Care Unit, Internal Medicine Department, from April 2018 to May 2019. Patients were informed about the research and signed informed consent. Acute STEMI is diagnosed when there is chest pain lasting ≥ 30 min; ST-segment elevation defined according to the European Society of Cardiology/ACCF/AHA as a new ST elevation at the J point affecting at least 2 contiguous leads of ≥ 2 mm in males or ≥ 1.5 mm in females in leads V2–V3 and/or of ≥ 1 mm in remaining contiguous chest or limb leads [5]. Successful reperfusion determined by resolution of ST-segment ≥ 50% 1 h after thrombolysis, which can be classified into partial resolution [50–70%] or complete resolution [> 70%].

Patients ≥ 85 years old, with life-limiting non-cardiac disease, prior STEMI, left bundle branch block (LBBB), any contraindications to MRI, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, who were hemodynamically unstable to be transferred to CMR laboratory were excluded.

According to AH they were divided into 2 groups (patients with AH = 21 and patients without AH = 22). AH was defined as the presence of random plasma glucose > 140 mg/dl in non-diabetic patients within 2 h of admission [5]. Plasma glucose levels (PG) were assessed every 2 h; mean PG levels were calculated at days 1, 2, and 3 and just before CMR.

Data Collection

Demographic data including age, gender, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, duration of chest pain, Killip class, and electrocardiogram (ECG) data were collected. Venous blood samples were taken on admission to measure glucose level and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Low density lipoprotein (LDL) was assessed from fasting venous blood samples taken on the first morning after admission. Peak plasma values of creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB were also evaluated. Baseline serum creatinine clearance was also evaluated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula [6].

CMR protocol

Cardiac MRI was performed 4 to 6 days after acute STEMI with a 1.5-Tesla scanner (Philips, Achieva) using a 6-channel body array coil. Left ventricular (LV) long-axis scout images were taken to adjust the LV short-axis imaging planes [7]. Short-axis slices (thickness of 5 mm with a slice gap of 10 mm) were defined from the base to the apex of the heart. Imaging of the heart was performed at the end-systolic time to estimate left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and at the end-diastolic time to estimate left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Steady-state free precession sequences were used for cine imaging; a dark-blood T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery turbo-spin echo sequence (STIR) was applied to determine AAR (with edema), and a segmented phase-sensitive inversion-recovery (PSIR) steady-state free precession sequence was used for late enhancement imaging 10 min after intravenous injection of 0.15 mmol/kg of gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) (Magnevist; Bayer Schering, Berlin, Germany). All images were ECG-triggered and acquired during breath-holds. CMR studies were analyzed then offline (Philips Medical Systems, Nederland B.V).

CMR data analysis

Data were analyzed by using a 17-segment model. From short-axis views, both LVEDV and LVESV were measured. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated as LVEF = (EDV − ESV)/EDV.

For each patient, AAR was recognized as hyper-intense zones on T2-weighted images; left ventricular endo- and epicardial borders had been delineated; then, reference normal area was drawn. AAR was defined as the percentage of LV volume delineated by the hyper-intense zone on T2-STIR images with signal intensity was > 2 standard deviations above the mean signal obtained in the distant non-infarcted myocardium and was expressed as a percentage of normal myocardium. FIS was measured on PSIR sequences by delineating epicardial and endocardial borders; the papillary muscle was considered as a part of the cavity of the left ventricle; then, a myocardial area was regarded as hyper-intense whenever the signal intensity was > 2 standard deviations above the mean signal intensity in the non-infarcted myocardium; then, the FIS was expressed as a percentage of normal non-infarcted myocardium (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cardiac MRI at 1 week in a patient with a large anterior myocardial infarction. a Late enhancement imaging allowed for the definition of infarct size (hyper-enhanced myocardium, between red arrows). B T2-weighted sequence demonstrated a large area at risk (with edema, between yellow arrows)

Statistical analysis

IBM-SPSS 21 was used for the analysis of data. The normality was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The continuous variables were presented as the means ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables were expressed in the form of percentages. The difference in frequencies among different groups was compared by Chi-square which was used to test differences in categorical data between groups, while Student t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test differences in means in continuous variables between groups (parametric and non-parametric). Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated for univariate correlations between echo and CMR parameters. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to test the independent predictors of FIS.

Results

Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics

The data showed that male is the predominate gender (86.4% of the euglycemic group and 81% of AH group) with insignificant differences between both groups as regards mean age (p value = 0.487) and gender (p value = 0.473). Patients with AH had a significantly longer chest pain duration, higher heart rate on discharge, higher percent of anterior MI, higher summation of ST elevations (sum STE) on admission and maximum ST-segment elevations (max STE) on admission, and higher baseline echocardiography-derived classic WMSI (Table 1).

Table 1 Patients’ clinical and echocardiographic characteristics

In comparing PG levels between both groups, there was insignificant difference in all days before CMR performance; only they were significantly different in admission plasma glucose levels (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison between the stress hyperglycemia group and the euglycemic group as regards plasma glucose levels in all days before cardiac magnetic resonance

CMR findings

Although there were no differences in LVEDV, LVESV, and EF between the two groups, the AH group had significantly higher classic WMSI, larger FIS, and AAR (Table 3).

Table 3 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging findings

Correlation analysis

Figure 2 shows that there was a significant positive correlation between admission plasma glucose (APG), FIS, and AAR in patients with STEMI.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation between admission blood glucose and final infraction size (FIS) and area at risk (AAR)

Regression analysis

The multivariate linear regression analysis of the significant factors affecting myocardial CMR LGE infarction size. After adjusting for age, the final linear regression model contained six predictors: chest pain duration, APG, peak CK-MB, sum ST, max ST, and WMSI estimated by CMR (Table 4).

Table 4 The multivariate linear regression analysis of the factors affecting FIS

Discussion

Despite improvements in medical and interventional therapies in the last 40 years, acute STEMI is still a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. Many studies were done to determine possible factors that may increase poor outcomes in STEMI patients, mostly following myocardial remodeling. Admission hyperglycemia is a unique factor deserving a great interest to investigate its role in the outcomes of STEMI patients, with special emphasis on its relation to FIS and AAR.

Roles of hyperglycemia in patients with STEMI have many points of interest, first, chronic hyperglycemia which present even before AMI in diabetic patients, increased myocardial susceptibility to infarction in DM patients was indicated by two clinical studies, which detected significantly larger infarct size measured by SPECT in diabetic than non-diabetic patients [8]. This can be explained by impaired collateral recruitment, microcirculatory abnormalities, and underuse of evidence-based therapies [9]; second, hyperglycemia during hospital stay, and lastly and more interestingly, AH which is a unique predictor studied by our research and attracted more attention to the need of more strict control of admission plasma glucose.

Egypt has nearly 100 million people who have special demographic and social characteristics which increase the possibility of the stress-induced conditions and its health-associated problems; some of these characteristics may be shared with other developing nations. Previous Egyptian studies confirmed that elevated admission glucose level is a strong predictor of short-term adverse outcomes in patients with AMI but no previous studies in our country regarding the impact of AH on AAR, FIS, or SI which is the major concept of our research [10, 11].

An Indian study had addressed the association of AHG and increased myocardial damage evidenced by cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic derived data but without using CMR modality. In that study, increased admission plasma glucose was associated with lower LVEF, higher WMSI, and higher CKMB in STEMI patients, all in line with our results except for LVEF which had an insignificant association with AHG in our studied population [12].

One major finding in our study is that AAR was positively correlated with APG; this is explained by the fact that acute hyperglycemia may increase the inflammatory response during STEMI and could thus influence microvascular permeability and edema [13]. To the limit of our knowledge, few studies investigated the impact of stress hyperglycemia on AAR [14]. Another study found no association between AHG and FIS [15].

Moreover, admission plasma glucose associated with larger FIS estimated by CMR and assessed by delayed enhancement (DE) score in acute STEMI patients [16]. However, the mechanism by which admission hyperglycemia adversely affect myocardial FIS is not well understood. But it was proved that admission hyperglycemia strongly predicted the reduction of epicardial flow in the infarct-related vessel before reperfusion therapy in patients with STEMI [17]. Moreover, admission hyperglycemia may be a consequence of large infarction size rather than the cause; as infarction increases in size, more catecholamines are secreted, which in turn affect fatty acids and glucose secretion [18].

Several studies have investigated the clinical impact of LGE on patient outcome after AMI. However, few studies have evaluated clinical factors or laboratory parameters that may be predictive for the development of LGE. Identification of such predictors for the development of LGE post-AMI may facilitate early risk stratification, even before cardiac imaging. In line with our study, a previous one supported that delayed presentation was predictor for larger infarction size [19]. In contradiction to our results, a previous one found no significant relationship between the time to PCI and infarction size [20]. Supporting to our data, a previous study revealed that high CK-MB values were independent predictors of LGE [21]. Similarly, Klug et al. observed a correlation between CK value and infarct size in reperfused STEMI [22].

In this small study, we tried to start highlighting the ability of CMR-derived prognosticators to detect the impact of AHG on FIS and AAR in this cohort of patients in Egypt without neglecting less accurate but more available and less costly ECG and echocardiographic data.

Study limitations

Our study did not include any data regarding details of insulin therapy given to the patients with admission hyperglycemia which may influence the FIS and AAR. So, it is recommended to investigate the role of glucose-lowering therapy in hyperglycemic patients on FIS. Our study interpretation should be applied to low- and moderate-risk STEMI patients as high-risk STEMI (e.g., higher Killip class or cardiogenic shock) patients are excluded because they were not able to continue the procedure. Financial problems and lack of funding support restricted the sample size which decreases the validity of the studied variables.

Conclusions

Admission plasma glucose positively correlates with CMR estimated FIS and AAR in successfully reperfused STEMI.

Availability of data and materials

• Patients are recruited from those who were admitted to Critical Care Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Assiut University.

• CMR was performed in Radiology Department, Assiut University.

• Gadolinium used in CMR was on our expense as there was no any funding support.

Abbreviations

AAR:

Area at risk

AH:

Admission hyperglycemia

APG:

Admission plasma glucose

CK:

Creatine kinase

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance

DE:

Delayed enhancement

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

EF:

Ejection fraction

FIS:

Final infarction size

Gd-DTPA:

Gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid

HbA1c:

Glycated hemoglobin

LBBB:

Left bundle branch block

LDL:

Low density lipoprotein

LGE:

Late gadolinium enhancement

LV:

Left ventricular

LVEDV:

Left ventricular end-diastolic volume

LVESV:

Left ventricular end-systolic volume

Max STE:

Maximum ST segment elevation

PPCI:

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention

PSIR:

Phase sensitive inversion recovery

SD:

Standard deviation

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

STEMI:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

STIR:

Short-tau inversion-recovery turbo-spin echo sequence

Sum STE:

Summation of ST segment elevation

WMSI:

Wall motion score index

References

  1. Organization WH (2017) Fact sheet: the top 10 causes of death. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cinar H, Akkan Avci MG, Avci BS, Comertpay E, Satar S (2019) Does stress hyperglycemia affect mortality? Acute myocardial infarction–case control study Archives of medical sciences Atherosclerotic diseases 4:e201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz EF, Javed F, Alviar CL, Herzog E. Triple vessel coronary artery disease presenting as a markedly positive stress electrocardiographic test and a negative SPECT-TL scintigram: a case of balanced ischemia. Heart Int 2011; 6: hi. 2011. e2022

  4. Krittayaphong R, Laksanabunsong P, Maneesai A et al (2008) Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance of late gadolinium enhancement and diastolic wall thickness to predict recovery of left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-10-41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Koliaki C, Liatis S, Kokkinos A (2019) Obesity and cardiovascular disease: revisiting an old relationship. Metabolism 92:98–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cockcroft DW, Gault H (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottin Y, Touzery C, Guy F et al (1999) MR imaging of the heart in patients after myocardial infarction: effect of increasing intersection gap on measurements of left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and wall thickness. Radiology 213:513–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alegria JR, Miller TD, Gibbons RJ, Yi Q-L, Yusuf S (2007) Infarct size, ejection fraction, and mortality in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Am Heart J 154:743–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah AM, Uno H, Køber L et al (2010) The inter-relationship of diabetes and left ventricular systolic function on outcome after high-risk myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail 12:1229–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaghla HE, Elbadry MA, Ashour AM, Abdelfatah MM (2014) Influence of admission blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c on outcome of acute myocardial infarction. The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine 26:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalfallah M, Abdelmageed R, Elgendy E, Hafez YM (2019) Incidence, predictors and outcomes of stress hyperglycemia in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Diab Vasc Dis Res 1479164119883983

  12. Chakraborty S, Majumder B, Sarkar D, Chatterjee S (2017) A simple non-invasive ECG technique to localize culprit vessel occlusion site in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 8:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marfella R, Siniscalchi M, Esposito K et al (2003) Effects of stress hyperglycemia on acute myocardial infarction: role of inflammatory immune process in functional cardiac outcome. Diabetes Care 26:3129–3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lønborg J, Vejlstrup N, Kelbæk H et al (2014) Impact of acute hyperglycemia on myocardial infarct size, area at risk, and salvage in patients with STEMI and the association with exenatide treatment: results from a randomized study. Diabetes 63:2474–2485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ota S, Tanimoto T, Orii M et al (2015) Association between hyperglycemia at admission and microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiol 65:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cochet A, Zeller M, Lalande A et al (2008) Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance to assess association between admission hyperglycemia and myocardial damage in patients with reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, de Boer M-J et al (2005) Hyperglycemia is an important predictor of impaired coronary flow before reperfusion therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:999–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Gerstein HC (2000) Stress hyperglycaemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview. Lancet 355:773–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nallamothu BK, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM (2007) Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 357:1631–1638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schömig A, Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J et al (2003) Therapy-dependent influence of time-to-treatment interval on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with coronary artery stenting or thrombolysis. Circulation 108:1084–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abanador-Kamper N, Kamper L, Vorpahl M et al (2017) Clinical predictors for the manifestation of late gadolinium enhancement after acute myocardial infarction. Medicine 96

  22. Klug G, Mayr A, Mair J et al (2011) Role of biomarkers in assessment of early infarct size after successful p-PCI for STEMI. Clin Res Cardiol 100:501–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their families for their participation in this study.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

1. T.M: the acquisition and analysis of data, approved the submitted version, and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. 2. M.A: put the concept of the research, approved the submitted version, and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. 3. R.A: put the design of the research, approved the submitted version, and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. 4. H.I: revision of the work, approved the submitted version, and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. 5. D.H: interpretation of data, approved the submitted version, and agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taghreed Sayed Meshref.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

“The Committee of Medical Ethics” of Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, had approved the study with reference no. 17200407.

Written consents were obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

No identifying images nor personal data were included in the manuscript.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meshref, T.S., Ashry, M.A., El-Aal, R.F.A. et al. Unique role of admission hyperglycemia on myocardial infarction size and area at risk following an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Egypt J Intern Med 32, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-020-00015-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-020-00015-y

Keywords