Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Download PDF

Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) as a predictor of liver fibrosis in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine volume 35, Article number: 38 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the fastest growing cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The prevalence of NAFLD increases in parallel with the increasing prevalence in obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Recently, more evidence indicates the important role of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) on metabolic health.

Methods

A controlled cross-sectional cohort study was conducted upon 60 patients (NAFLD and control group). Patients were categorized according to the NAFLD fibrosis score. All patients subjected to routine labs and SHBG measurement.

Results

BMI was 35.80 ± 6.56 SD and 23.23 ± 2.5 SD in the NAFLD group and control group respectively. The NAFLD fibrosis score was 2.12 ± 1.47 SD. Fifty patients were categorized as advanced liver fibrosis: F3–F4 (> 0.675). No patients scored to exclude advanced liver fibrosis: F0–F2 (< − 1.455). The remaining 10 patients were categorized as indeterminate (in-between). There was a significant correlation between age, mid-arm circumference, waist circumference, BMI, serum albumin level, lipid profile components, as well as the NAFLD fibrosis score and SHBG levels using univariable regression analysis. There was also a significant correlation between mid-arm circumference, waist circumference, lipid profile components as well as SHBG levels and the NAFLD fibrosis score using univariable regression analysis. SHBG can predict severe liver fibrosis (F3–F4) in our NAFLD female cohort at a cut-off level of > 10 ng/mL, with 34% sensitivity and 90% specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.548, with 95% Confidence interval 0.414 to 0.677.

Conclusion

SHBG is positively correlated to severe fibrosis in female NAFLD patients. It is an efficient positive predictor of severe fibrosis in female NAFLD patients at a cut-off level > 10 ng/ml, with a high specificity and modest sensitivity.

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now considered to be the fastest growing cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Recent estimates suggest that 25% of the world population have got NAFLD. In fact, NAFLD is now one of the leading causes of cirrhosis and indications for liver transplantation in the USA [1]. NAFLD is characterized by increased liver fat content, with a threshold of > 5%, in the absence of significant alcohol consumption (characterized as 30 g/day for men and 20 g/day for women) or other secondary cause of steatosis [2]. It can be subcategorized as nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), when there is only evidence of hepatic steatosis on liver histology, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), when there are steatosis, lobular inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning with or without perisinusoidal fibrosis [3]. NAFLD may progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, but its cardio metabolic counterparts are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in those patients [4]. Worldwide prevalence of obesity among NAFLD and NASH patients were 51 and 81%, respectively [5].

Metabolic syndrome is characterized as a cluster of metabolic disorders such as abdominal obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and impaired glycemia. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to ATP III criteria: any 3 out of the following 5: IFG, fasting glucose ≥ 100; DM, standard ADA criteria; TG ≥ 150; HDL < 50 (female cohort); Hypertension: BP > 130/85 and waist circumference ≥ 88 (female cohort) [6].

Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) a glycoprotein produced by the liver that transports the hormones testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol in the blood as biologically inactive forms. Changes in SHBG levels can affect the amount of hormone that is available to be used by the body tissues [7]. Studies have shown that low SHBG levels are predictive of higher risk for developing hypertension, T2DM, and metabolic syndrome in the general population. Moreover, lower serum SHBG is also associated with elevated serum liver enzymes in men with hepatic steatosis [8].

The relationship between SHBG and metabolic disorders might be explained by androgen. Lower SHBG usually leads to free and biologically active androgens in the circulation and might disrupt insulin secretion and pancreatic β-cell function and aggravate the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Moreover, lower expression of SHBG in NAFLD may occur secondary to inflammation. An increase in TNFα in response to activation of JNK and NF-κB, reduces SHBG production in HepG2 cells [9]. The relationship between low SHBG levels and development of various metabolic derangements including components of the metabolic syndrome and NAFLD is well established in the literature. However, little is known about the relationships between SHBG and liver fibrosis in NAFLD.

Materials and methods

This work was a controlled cross-sectional cohort study. The present study included 60 Egyptian patients recruited from Kasr Al Ainy Hospital in the period from March 2019 to July 2022. Patients were consecutively recruited from the ultrasonography unit in the Department of Internal Medicine.

Patients (NAFLD group) were included according to inclusion criteria: 18–60 years old adult female patients and fulfillment of ultrasound criteria of NAFLD. Exclusion criteria included clinical, biochemical, or histological evidence of cirrhosis; exclusion of other causes of liver disease; current or past excessive alcohol drinking was defined by an average daily consumption of more than 20 g alcohol; pregnancy, hormonal contraception (oral or parenteral), hormone replacement. To exclude other causes of liver disease, all subjects were screened for viral hepatitis (hepatitis B and C viral markers) and autoimmune hepatitis. Patients known to have primary biliary cirrhosis, celiac disease or Wilson disease were excluded. Control subjects included 30 age matched healthy female volunteers (control group).

A written informed consent was obtained from each participant or her legal guardian. The study was approved by the ethical committee of internal Medicine in Cairo University (MS-224–2019).

The patients were subjected to review of medical history. Vital signs and full general and local examination was done to all study patients. Anthropometric measurements were done in the form of body weight and height were measured in light clothing and without shoes to the nearest 0.5 kg, using calibrated scales. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Waist circumference was measured in cm, midway between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest, with subjects standing with their heels together, during normal expiration with a non-stretchable measuring tape. Mid-arm circumference was measured by a flexible non-stretchable tape on the front of the left upper arm at a distance halfway between inferior aspect of the acromion and the olecranon.

Ultrasound diagnosis of fatty liver was done using the following 4 parameters by experienced operators: (1) diffuse hyperechoic echotexture (“bright liver”); (2) increased liver echotexture compared with the kidneys; (3) vascular blurring; (4) deep attenuation.

Laboratory investigations were done to all patients and control including: complete blood picture, coagulation profile (PT, PC, INR), ALT, AST, albumin, bilirubin total and direct, ALP, GGT, lipid profile, FBG, and SHBG. Known concentrations of Human SHBG Standard and its corresponding reading OD is plotted on the log scale (x-axis) and the log scale (y-axis) respectively. The concentration of Human SHBG in sample is determined by plotting the sample’s O.D. on the Y-axis. The original concentration is calculated by multiplying the dilution factor. Assay range: 0.3 ng/mL–20 ng/mL. NAFLD fibrosis score was calculated using the equation by excel sheet [10] :

$$\mathrm{``}-1.675+0.037\times\mathrm{age}\;(\mathrm{years})+0.094\times\mathrm{BMI}\;(\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm m2)+1.13\times\mathrm{IFG}/\mathrm{diabetes}\;(\mathrm{yes}=1,\mathrm{no}=0)+0.99\times\mathrm{AST}/\mathrm{ALT\;ratio}-0.013\times\mathrm{platelet}\;(\times109/\mathrm l)-0.66\times\mathrm{albumin}\;(\mathrm g/\mathrm{dl})\text{''}$$

Patients were categorized according to the NAFLD fibrosis score:

  • •NAFLD Score <  − 1.455 = F0–F2.

  • •NAFLD Score − 1.455–0.675 = indeterminate score.

  • •NAFLD Score > 0.675 = F3–F4.

Statistical methods

All data was entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet. Statistical analysis was done using MedCalc software. Continuous data was tested for normal distribution using the D'Agostino-Pearson test. Data with normal distribution were presented as mean and standard deviation, and subsequently analyzed using parametric tests as T test for unpaired comparison. While data that was not normally distributed was presented as maximum, minimum, median and 25th–75th percentiles, and subsequently analyzed using non-parametric tests as the Mann–Whitney test for unpaired comparison. Regression analysis was done to calculate correlation coefficients with greater accuracy and probable causal relationships. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to test SHBG as a marker of liver fibrosis and to assess its sensitivity and specificity. P values were considered significant if < 0.05.

Results

Age and anthropometric measurements

The age ranged between 18 years as the minimum and 60 years as the maximum. The median was 40 years and 25th to 75th percentiles were 31 to 50 years. There was no significant difference between the two study groups regarding age of the subjects.

The mean ± SD of BMI was 35.80 ± 6.56 and 23.23 ± 2.5 in the NAFLD group and control group respectively. BMI was significantly higher in the NAFLD group.

The mean ± SD of the mid-arm circumference in the NAFLD group was 37.41 ± 3.35.The mean ± SD of the waist circumference in the NAFLD group was 89.97 ± 8.83.

Frequency of the metabolic syndrome and its components among NAFLD patients

Of the 60 NAFLD patients, 39 (65%) had a waist circumference ≥ 88 cm; 8 (13%) had hypertension; 45 (75%) had TG ≥ 150 mg/dl; 31 (52%) had HDL mg/dl < 50; 17 (28%) had IFG/DM and finally 28 patients (47%) fit the ATP III definition for metabolic syndrome as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Frequency of the metabolic syndrome and its components in NAFLD cases

Full size image

Comparison between the NAFLD group and control group regarding laboratory variables

Hemoglobin, serum albumin, and HDL were significantly lower in the NAFLD group than the control group. On the other hand, ALT, AST, ALP, INR, TG, and LDL were significantly higher. There was NO difference in SHBG levels between the 2 groups. P values were illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Comparison between the NAFLD group and control group regarding laboratory variables
Full size table

NAFLD fibrosis score and severity of fibrosis in NAFLD patients

The mean ± SD of the NAFLD fibrosis score was 2.12 ± 1.47. According to the NAFLD fibrosis score, 50 patients were categorized as advanced liver fibrosis: F3-F4 (> 0.675). No patients scored to exclude advanced liver fibrosis: F0-F2 (< − 1.455). The remaining 10 patients were categorized as indeterminate (in-between) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The frequency of different degrees of fibrosis in NAFLD patients

Full size image

Regression analysis of various variables and SHBG levels

There was a significant correlation between age, mid-arm circumference, waist circumference, BMI, serum albumin level, lipid profile components as well as the NAFLD fibrosis score (all as continuous variables) and SHBG levels using univariable regression analysis as shown in Fig. 3. Likewise, a significant correlation between diabetes mellitus, hypertension and the metabolic syndrome (all as categorical variables) and SHBG levels using univariable regression analysis. All correlation coefficients were positive, as demonstrated in Table 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scatter diagram showing the relation between NAFLD fibrosis score and SHBG levels

Full size image
Table 2 Regression analysis of various variables versus SHBG levels
Full size table

Regression analysis of various variables and NAFLD fibrosis score

There was a significant correlation between mid-arm circumference, waist circumference, lipid profile components as well as SHBG levels (all as continuous variables) and the NAFLD fibrosis score using univariable regression analysis. Likewise, a significant correlation between hypertension and the metabolic syndrome (as categorical variables) and NAFLD fibrosis score using univariable regression analysis. All correlation coefficients were positive, as demonstrated in Table 3.

Table 3 Regression analysis of various variables versus NAFLD fibrosis score
Full size table

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) for testing the performance of SHBG in detection of severe liver fibrosis (F3–F4)

SHBG can predict severe liver fibrosis (F3–F4) in our NAFLD female cohort at a cut-off level of > 10 ng/mL, with 34% sensitivity and 90% specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.548, with 95% confidence interval 0.414 to 0.677 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Roc curve for SHBG ng/ml in prediction of advanced liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients

Full size image

Discussion

As aforementioned, only few studies addressed the relationship of SHBG to liver fibrosis. In contrast to previous findings showing low SHBG concentrations in NAFLD, a recent study involving 363 Japanese men provided evidence that high SHBG was associated with liver fibrosis [11]. No similar studies were done to study female patients with NAFLD. The aim of this study was to study the association of SHBG to liver fibrosis in female NAFLD patients.

In our study, BMI was significantly higher in the NAFLD group. This expectedly agrees with many previous studies like the study of Chang et al. which included 77,425 men and women free of NAFLD and metabolic abnormalities at the baseline. They found that increasing baseline BMI showed a strong and approximately linear relationship with the incidence of NAFLD. This association was present in both men and women, although it was stronger in women (P < 0.001), and it was evident in all clinically relevant subgroups evaluated, including participants with low inflammation status [12].

Moreover, among the 60 NAFLD patients, 28 patients (47%) fit the ATP III definition for metabolic syndrome. This also agrees with many previous studies. An American study by Marchesini G et al. assessed the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in 304 consecutive NAFLD patients without overt diabetes, on the basis of 3 or more criteria out of 5 defined by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (waist circumference, glucose, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and arterial pressure). The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome increased with increasing body mass index, from 18% in normal-weight subjects to 67% in obesity. Insulin resistance (Homeostasis Model Assessment method) was significantly associated with the metabolic syndrome. Liver biopsy was available in 163 cases (54%). A total of 120 patients (73.6%) were classified as having nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); 88% of them had the metabolic syndrome [13].

Fattahi MR et al. also found that NAFLD was associated with the metabolic syndrome in a study conducted on 2980 peoples aged ≥ 18 years. Metabolic syndrome was detected in 65.9%of men and 64.6% of women with NAFLD, based on NCEP/ATP-III criteria [14].

Other significant p-values were found comparing the liver function tests including AST, ALT, ALP, and INR. Elevated transaminases and impairment of liver functions is an expected finding in patients with NAFLD. This agrees with the study of NoeLopez-Amador that showed among 40 hospital patients with NAFLD, the most frequent disorder was elevation of ALT levels (72.5%), and also AST (25%) and ALP (45%) to a lesser extent [15].

Also, a study by Debmalya Sanyal et al. showed that mild elevations of liver enzymes in the upper normal range are associated with features of metabolic syndrome and NAFLD in a cross-sectional study including 152 patients with impaired glucose tolerance and 158 recently detected T2DM subjects aged between 30 and 69 years [16]. Another study by Chen Z et al. found a strong relationship between ALT levels and metabolic syndrome in NAFLD and revealed that the cluster of metabolic syndrome components might be the predictor for ALT (P < 0.001) [17].

Although liver enzymes are raised in most cases, both fatty liver and NASH with histologically significant disease may exist without elevation of ALT in a significant proportion of patients as highlighted before in several studies [18, 19].

This study shows a significant correlation between SHBG and age. Previous studies show significant variability of SHBG levels with age changes. A cohort study by Maggio M et al. performed on 616 Italian women, found that serum SHBG levels showed a U-shaped trajectory with age, declining from the 2nd to the 6th decade of life and increasing after the 6th decade (p < 0.0001) [20].

This study also demonstrates a positive correlation between SHBG and the anthropometric measures in the form of BMI, mid-arm circumference and waist circumference (p value < 0.0001 for each). In contrary, Luboslav et al. had recently showed that obese and overweight patients had significantly lower total SHBG than lean control subjects [21].

Similarly, and controversial to previous literature, SHBG showed no significant difference between NAFLD patients and controls. Previous literature has repeatedly proven lower SHBG levels with NAFLD female patients in particular [22,23,24,25,26,27].

Most important to the target of this study, a significant positive correlation between SHBG and NAFLD fibrosis score was highlighted. So, higher SHBG levels were associated with more severe liver fibrosis. This was the opposite relationship to that observed between NAFLD and lower SHBG levels, as discussed above. The precise mechanisms for the positive relationship between SHBG and NAFLD fibrosis score are unclear, but theoretical presumptions are possible.

High SHBG concentration may reflect less fat deposition in the liver. Importantly, Miyaaki et al. reported that the amount of liver fat may decrease with the progression of fibrosis in patients with hepatic steatosis [28]. Furthermore, Stefan et al. reported that serum SHBG increases as liver fat mass decreases and SHBG has been shown to increase in parallel with a decrease in intrahepatic fat mass, assessed using ultrasound [29], computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Interestingly, these clinical observations may be explained by the finding that SHBG has anti-inflammatory and lipolytic effects on cultured adipocytes and macrophages. Thus, the increase in SHBG alongside that of NAFLD fibrosis score may reflect a compensatory increase, which may lead to a reduction in intrahepatic fat mass and retard the progression of inflammation and liver fibrosis. This data suggests that there may be a specific pathologic association between liver fibrosis and SHBG in NAFLD [30].

Worthy of note, this presumed fluctuation in SHBG, that increases with the development of NAFLD with subsequent decrement with advancing fibrosis is the likely reason that explains the absence of any significant difference in SHBG level between the NAFLD cohort as a whole when compared to healthy controls.

An essential observation in this study cohort is that despite consecutive enrolment of patients, all turned out to fall in the F3–F4 or indeterminate categories. None had mild or no fibrosis. This explains the higher SHBG levels in our cohort, which gives us a probably false positive correlation with multiple variables, including the metabolic syndrome and its components. Past studies included the full spectrum of asymptomatic NAFLD patients and a negative correlation of SHBG levels with the metabolic syndrome and its components as well as NAFLD was established. This is opposed to our cohort that was recruited from the internal medicine ultrasonography department which mainly comprises ward inpatients. Therefore, this study represents a specific subcategory of NAFLD patients with severe disease. Higher SHBG in contrast to previous literature is due to advancing fibrosis.

ROC curve analysis showed that SHBG can predict severe liver fibrosis (F3–F4) in our NAFLD female cohort at a cut-off level of > 10 ng/ml (equivalent to 0.105 nmol/L), with 34% sensitivity and 90% specificity, Area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.548. A similar study involving 363 Japanese men with NAFLD also showed that high SHBG was associated with liver fibrosis. Their cut-off for SHBG was > 49.8 nmol/L as a predictor of FIB-4 index ≥ 1.3, AUC = 0.649. Sensitivity and specificity were not stated though [11].

The sensitivity in our female NAFLD cohort was modest which makes it a poor negative test, while its high specificity renders the suggested cut-off > 10 ng/ml an excellent positive test for predicting severe fibrosis, without the need to perform further testing as a fibroscan and/or a core biopsy.

Another earlier study with a similar result, but also involving male patients with NAFLD, was done in 2016. It was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 534 participants. SHBG was positively correlated with the NAFLD fibrosis score [31].

This study was the first to be performed on female patients with NAFLD. This study has some limitations. The authors view the study as a preliminary one that requires further validation in a larger cohort. Also, despite consecutive enrolment; no patients were in the F0–F1 category. This category still needs to be tested.

Conclusion

SHBG is positively correlated to severe fibrosis in female NAFLD patients. It is an efficient positive predictor of severe fibrosis in female NAFLD patients at a cut-off level > 10 ng/ml, with a high specificity and modest sensitivity. The authors conclude that SHBG is a potential non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis in female patients with NAFLD. Authors recommend further validation of the above results to consider SHBG as a potential non-invasive, cost effective marker of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes

SHBG:

Sex hormone binding globulin

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

NAFL:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver

NASH:

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

References

  1. Pouwels, Sjaak, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a review of pathophysiology, clinical management and effects of weight loss. BMC Endocrine Disorders, vol. 22, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00980-1. Accessed 26 Mar. 2023.

  2. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE et al (2018) The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 67(1):328–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leoni S, Tovoli F, Napoli L, Serio I, Ferri S, Bolondi L (2018) Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review with comparative analysis. World J Gastroenterol 24(30):3361–3373. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i30.3361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Marjot T, Moolla A, Cobbold JF, Hodson L, Tomlinson JW. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults: current concepts in etiology, outcomes, and management. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(1):bnz009. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnz009.

  5. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M (2016) Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 64(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement [published correction appears in Circulation. 2005 Oct 25;112(17):e297] [published correction appears in Circulation. 2005 Oct 25;112(17):e298]. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–2752. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404.

  7. Yang, Qingtao, et al. Association of total testosterone, free testosterone, bioavailable testosterone, sex hormone–binding globulin, and hypertension. Medicine, vol. 98, no. 20, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015628. Accessed 26 Mar. 2023.

  8. Daka, Bledar, et al. Low sex hormone-binding globulin is associated with hypertension: a cross-sectional study in a Swedish population. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, vol. 13, 2013, p. 30, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-30. Accessed 26 Mar. 2023.

  9. Luo, Jing, et al. Association of sex hormone-binding globulin with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adults. Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-018-0313-8. Accessed 26 Mar. 2023.

  10. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G et al (2007) The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 45(4):846–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujihara Y, Hamanoue N, Yano H et al (2019) High sex hormone-binding globulin concentration is a risk factor for high fibrosis-4 index in middle-aged Japanese men. Endocr J 66(7):637–645. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang Y, Ryu S, Choi Y et al (2016) Metabolically healthy obesity and development of chronic kidney disease: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 164(5):305–312. https://doi.org/10.7326/m15-1323. (PMID: 26857595).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome [published correction appears in Hepatology. 2003 Aug;38(2):536]. Hepatology. 2003;37(4):917–923. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50161

  14. Fattahi, Mohammad, et al. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; a population-based study. Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases, vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, pp. 131–137, https://doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2016.18. Accessed 26 Mar. 2023.

  15. Amador NL, Hipolito CN, Rojas JM, Zarrabal OC (2017) Liver enzymes in patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in Veracruz: a comparative analysis with the literature. Clinical Investigation. 7(1):25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sanyal D, Mukherjee P, Raychaudhuri M, Ghosh S, Mukherjee S, Chowdhury S (2015) Profile of liver enzymes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and newly detected untreated type 2 diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 19(5):597–601. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.163172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen ZW, Chen LY, Dai HL, Chen JH, Fang LZ (2008) Relationship between alanine aminotransferase levels and metabolic syndrome in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 9(8):616–622. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0720016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M et al (2003) Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology 37(6):1286–1292. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E et al (2008) Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. Hepatology 48(3):792–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maggio M, Lauretani F, Basaria S et al (2008) Sex hormone binding globulin levels across the adult lifespan in women–the role of body mass index and fasting insulin. J Endocrinol Invest 31(7):597–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03345608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stárka L, Hill M, Pospíšilová H, Dušková M (2020) Estradiol, obesity and hypogonadism. Physiol Res 69(Suppl 2):S273–S278. https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hua X, Li M, Pan F, Xiao Y, Cui W, Hu Y. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is an influencing factor for the association of SHBG with metabolic syndrome in diabetes patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14532. Published 2017 Nov 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15232-9.

  23. Jaruvongvanich V, Sanguankeo A, Riangwiwat T, Upala S (2017) Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol 16(3):382–394. https://doi.org/10.5604/16652681.1235481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Mantzoros CS (2019) Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism 92:82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Qu X, Donnelly R. Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) as an early biomarker and therapeutic target in polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8191. Published 2020 Nov 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218191.

  26. Wang N, Zhai H, Zhu C, et al. Combined association of vitamin D and sex hormone binding globulin with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in men and postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(4):e2621. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002621.

  27. Saez-Lopez C, Barbosa-Desongles A, Hernandez C, et al. Sex hormone-binding globulin reduction in metabolic disorders may play a role in NAFLD development [published correction appears in Endocrinology. 2019 Jun 1;160(6):1436]. Endocrinology. 2017;158(3):545–559. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2016-1668.

  28. Miyaaki H, Ichikawa T, Nakao K et al (2008) Clinicopathological study of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Japan: the risk factors for fibrosis. Liver Int 28(4):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01614.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Flechtner-Mors M, Schick A, Oeztuerk S et al (2014) Associations of fatty liver disease and other factors affecting serum SHBG concentrations: a population based study on 1657 subjects. Horm Metab Res 46(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1354369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonnet F, Velayoudom Cephise FL, Gautier A et al (2013) Role of sex steroids, intrahepatic fat and liver enzymes in the association between SHBG and metabolic features. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 79(4):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mo, Qiu, et al. Relationship between total testosterone, sex hormone–binding globulin levels and the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in males: a meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 13, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188221106879. Accessed 26 Mar. 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge our great Kasr Al Ainy Hospital, and its workers, nurses, and staff members, for all the support and help in this study and throughout our careers.

Funding

Authors received no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Internal Medicine Department, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kasr Al-Aini School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Abeer Abdel-latif

  2. Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Ula Mabid Al-Jarhi, Mona khozam & Shaimaa A. Fathy

  3. Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Dina Hesham

Authors
  1. Abeer Abdel-latif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ula Mabid Al-Jarhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dina Hesham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mona khozam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shaimaa A. Fathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SF and DH analyzed and interpreted the patient data. MK collected the data. UM wrote the statistics of the manuscript. AAA was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. UM and AAA read and final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abeer Abdel-latif.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and form review board (MS-224–2019). Oral and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or from their eligible relatives.

The medical record profession has its own code of ethics that applies to all medical record practitioners. Confidentiality of data, safe data storage, and privacy rights are respected by all who handle patient information. Data were coded and patient names or identity did not appear on any of the data collection forms or during statistical analysis.

Consent for publication

Oral and written informed consents were obtained from the patients or from their eligible relatives.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-latif, A., Al-Jarhi, U.M., Hesham, D. et al. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) as a predictor of liver fibrosis in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Egypt J Intern Med 35, 38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-023-00220-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-023-00220-5

Keywords