Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Download PDF

MicroRNA 21as a novel biomarker in hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine volume 34, Article number: 56 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma is considered one of the most common cancers occurring in human population all over the world. It became an increasingly threatening malignancy due to both morbidity and mortality. Chronic viral hepatitis B and hepatitis C are two risk factors, which account for 80–90% of all HCC cases worldwide. Alfa Feto protien is used as a tumor marker for HCC diagnosis and prognosis prediction; however, its false negative rate when used alone is as high as 40% for patients with early-stage HCC. AFP levels remain normal in 15–30% of all the patients, even patients with advanced HCC. It has been demonstrated that miRNAs (MicroRNAs) are an important class of non-coding RNAs. They act as tumor oncogenes or suppressors and are involved in the HCC development. MiRNAs are endogenous nucleotides that can be found in intra- and extracellular spaces, such as the blood, urine, and saliva.

The study evaluated the miRNA 21 as a novel biomarker in patients with HCV related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Results

The study was conducted on three groups. Group (1) included 25 patients with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection. Group (2) included 25 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on top of liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection. Group (3) included 10 normal control subjects. There was a significant difference in the mean level of miRNA between the three groups with p value < 0.001 with the highest value in group 2 ( 8.28 ± 2.55), then in group1 (5.04 ± 2.11) and the lowest in group 3 (control) (1.02 ± 0.07). MiRNA 21 has a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 96%, to differentiate between the liver cirrhosis group and HCC group.

Conclusion

miRNA 21 can be a promising marker for detection of patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma, with higher specificity compared to α feto protein; however, its cost is higher.

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancer in humans all over the world [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become an increasingly threatening malignancy due to both morbidity and mortality [2].

HCV infection leads to chronic inflammation in the liver, which initiates several changes as a production of oxidative stress, steatosis, progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally HCC [1].

AFP is used as a tumor marker for HCC diagnosis and prognosis prediction; however, its false negative rate when used alone is as high as 40% for patients with early-stage HCC. It may remain normal in 15–30% of all the patients, even patients with advanced HCC [3, 4].

Despite the major advances achieved in the diagnostic management of HCC, only one third of the newly diagnosed patients can receive curative treatments [5]. Better understanding of HCC biology in addition to advances in technology have led to the discovery of novel biomarkers [5].

MiRNAs are considered an important class of non-coding RNAs which act as tumor oncogenes or suppressors and are involved in the HCC development [6]. They are endogenous nucleotides that are found in intra- and extracellular spaces, such as the blood, urine, and saliva [7, 8].

MiRNA-21 has been involved in the development of fibrosis in multiple organs and has also been suggested to act as an “oncomir.” MiRNA 21 was the microRNA that showed the strongest upregulation in activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in multiple models of fibrogenesis [9]. MiRNA 21 is closely related to hepatic malignancy.

Methods

The study was a prospective case-control study conducted on patients with HCV related liver cirrhosis and HCC. The study included 50 Egyptian patients with HCV infection recruited from the Internal Medicine department, [BLINDED FOR PEER REVIEW] University Hospital during the period January 2018 to January 2019. They were 35 males and 15 females with their age ranged from 45 to 82 years with a mean age of 62.22 ± 8.7. Group 1 included 25 patients with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection. Group 2 included 25 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on top of liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection. Group 3 included 10 volunteer normal control subjects. We excluded patients with hepatitis B virus infection, subjects with significant alcohol consumption (over 20 g per day in men or 10 g per day in women), patients with liver cirrhosis due to other causes than HCV infection, patients with hemodynamic instability, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The study protocol was approved by the Cairo University ethical committee. All participants provided a written informed consent. All participants underwent complete screening panel, including medical history, clinical examination, and biochemical profile including complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, coagulation profile, and serum AFP. Abdominal ultrasonography was done for diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, and detection of HCC which was confirmed by triphasic C.T. Serum samples from all participants were obtained for detection and quantification of the miRNA using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 25. Data was summarized using the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum or median and interquartile range in quantitative data and using frequency (count) and relative frequency (percentage) for categorical data. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (Chan, 2003a). For comparing categorical data, chi-square (χ2) test was performed. Exact test was used instead when the expected frequency is less than 5 [10]. Correlations between quantitative variables were done using Spearman correlation coefficient. The ROC curve was constructed with area under curve analysis performed to detect best cutoff value of miRNA 21 for detection of HCC and liver cirrhosis. P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

The mean level of platelet count, ALT, AST, and GGT were significantly higher in group 2 (patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on top liver cirrhosis) in comparison to group 1 (patients with liver cirrhosis) (P <0.001). The mean level of total and direct bilirubin were significantly higher in group 2 in comparison to group 1 (P <0.004). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, hemoglobin, albumin, prothrombin time, or INR (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and laboratory data of the patients
Full size table

Regarding the mean level of miRNA, there was a significant difference between the three groups with p value < 0.001 with the highest value in group 2 (8.28 ± 2.55), then in group 1 (5.04 ± 2.11) and the lowest in group 3 (control) (1.02 ± 0.07) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison between 3 groups regarding serum micro-RNA level
Full size table

There was a positive correlation between miRNA and platelet count, AST, ALT, and α feto protein (Table 3)

Table 3 The correlation between miRNA 21 and other parameters (ALT, AST, platelet count, and α feto protein)
Full size table

The ROC curve showed that the miRNA 21 has sensitivity 68% and specificity 96%, to differentiate between liver cirrhosis group and HCC group with an area under the curve of 0.834 and a cutoff value of 7.85. While alfa feto protein sensitivity was 84% and specificity 84% for detection of HCC from liver cirrhosis in our studied patients Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curve for detection of HCC from liver cirrhosis using miRNA 21

Full size image

Discussion

In Egypt, there was a remarkable increase in the proportion of HCC among patients with chronic liver diseases. This is due to the increasing risk factors including the emergence of HCV over the equal time frame, the contribution of (HBV) infection, improvement of the screening programs, and diagnostic tools for liver cancer as well as the improved survival rates among patients with cirrhosis to allow time for some of them to develop HCC [11]. Early detection of HCC is important as it improves overall survival, especially for patients who are able to receive potentially curative therapy [12].

Therefore, searching for new biomarkers became mandatory.

MiRNA-21 gene is located on human chromosome 17, which is a highly conserved microRNA. Micro RNA-21 is upregulated in various solid tumors, including breast cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer [13].

Micro-RNA-21 has been related to pathophysiological processes such as inflammation, fibrosis, cardiac hypertrophy, and ventricular remodeling [14]. The level of circulating microRNA-21 in patients with hypertensive heart disease was higher than that in the control group and was positively correlated with the expression of serum myocardial fibrosis markers [15].

The study evaluated miRNA 21 as a novel biomarker in patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

In our study we found that the plasma level of miRNA 21 was significantly higher in liver cirrhosis and HCC groups in comparison to the healthy control group, being highest among HCC patients compared to the other two groups with p-value < 0.001. Our results were similar to Guo et al. [16], El Gedawy et al. [17], Karakatsanis et al. [18], and Demerdash et al. [19].

Regarding the relation between miRNA 21 and tumor burden, our data showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the level of neither α feto protein nor miRNA 21 in relation to focal lesion number, site, or size of the tumor. On the other hand, Yi and Li reported that high expression of miRNA-21 was correlated with a tumor size of >5 cm but was not significantly correlated with tumor number or differentiation [20]. Hegazy et al. also reported no significant impacts of tumor characters as regards the number, site, size, and microscopic features on serum or tissue expression of miRNA 21 [21].

ROC analysis showed that miRNA 21 has a cutoff value of 7.85 to differentiate between the liver cirrhosis group and HCC group with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 96% and an area under the curve of 0.834, while alfa feto protein sensitivity was 84% and specificity was 84% for detection of HCC from liver cirrhosis.

Guo et al. study showed that serum miRNA-21 maintained its diagnostic efficiency in AFP-negative HCC patients. Their optimal diagnostic cutoff for miR-21 was 8.023-fold. They reported that AFP showed lower sensitivity and specificity and suggested that miRNA-21 could have a greater diagnostic performance in discriminating HCC, liver cirrhosis, and chronic hepatitis than AFP [16], while in our study, the sensitivity of miRNA 21 was lower than AFP (68% for miRNA 21 compared to 84%), but with higher specificity. El Gedawy et al. showed that miRNA-21 revealed that, at a cut-off value of 3.93 (fold expression), the sensitivity and specificity for differentiation of HCC cases were 93% and 90%, respectively [17]. Hegazy et al. found that the specificity of miRNA-21 was superior to AFP in diagnosis of HCC [21].

There was statistically significant difference between the liver cirrhosis group and HCC group as regards the median of α feto protein being higher in the HCC group with p-value < 0.001. These results were similar to studies done by Sacco et al. (2014). Tsai et al. (2014), Chen et al. (2006), and Changchien et al. (2008) [22,23,24,25].

Also, the miRNA 21 level was positively correlated with platelet count, AST, α feto protein, and ALT in all patients. El Gedawy et al. reported that there was a significant positive correlation between miRNA-21 and AFP in the HCC group and a significant positive correlation was detected between miRNA-21 and ALT in chronic liver disease group [17]. Demerdash et al. revealed a positive correlation between miRNA-21 and serum transaminase levels (ALT and AST), in both CHC and HCC groups [19].

Similarly, Bihrer et al. found that miRNA-21 serum levels were strongly correlated with ALT and AST activities [26].

Hegazy et al. reported that the serum miRNA 21 was directly correlated to α-fetoprotein [21].

In our study, the platelet count was significantly higher in HCC patients than liver cirrhosis patients, and this could be explained by being part of paramalignant syndrome associated with HCC or as hepatic malignancies can synthesize thrombopoietin, a major factor in platelet production. Platelets have been reported to interact with cancer cells and be involved in their growth enhancement [27]. Tumor microenvironment, needed for the development of tumor cells, is a complex system, which includes stromal, endothelial and immune cells, cytokines and growth factors, proteolytic enzymes like matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, and microvesicles and platelets [28, 29]. As tumor cells activate platelets, activated platelets in turn contribute to several steps of carcinogenesis ,such as the secretion of granules containing growth factors (IGF-1, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and PDGF), pro-angiogenic, and anti-angiogenic factors like (angiopoietin-1, angiostatin) [30].

Yalmaz and Erdal [30] in their study concluded that platelet count has a useful prognostic value in HCC and that it can be included in screening programs and can also be used to predict disease prognosis.

We found a statistically significant difference between the liver cirrhosis group and HCC group in the mean value of platelet count, AST, ALT, and GGT with (p-value 0.001), bilirubin (total and direct) with p-value 0.004 being higher in the HCC group. The elevation of liver function tests in HCC patients can be attributed to the on-going damage of the liver tissue due to malignant tissue growth, invasion, and subsequent loss of functioning liver cells.

Carr BI [31] reported that significantly higher aggressiveness score for HCC was associated with higher GGT, ALP, AST, and total bilirubin, as well as for platelets compared to other patients. It was also found to be associated with higher incidence of portal vein thrombosis, tumor multifocality, and higher AFP levels [32].

There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, hemoglobin, albumin, prothrombin time, or INR. Regarding the mean value of hemoglobin, it may be due to small sample size or may be due to hemoglobin drop as a result of blood loss from variceal bleeding which is more marked and frequent in HCC patients.

Bihrer et al. reported that the level of miRNA-21 in serum from patients with HCC on top of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) was elevated compared to healthy controls. However, they also reported increased levels of miRNA-21 in serum of patients with chronic hepatitis C without HCC with no difference between serum miRNA-21 level in both groups [26].

Hegazy et al. and Tomimaru et al. showed that miRNA 21 was overexpressed in the serum of patients with HCC compared to patients with chronic hepatitis [21, 33].

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study has shown that miRNA 21 is a promising marker for detection of patients with HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma, with higher specificity and lower sensitivity compared to α feto protein; however, its cost is higher.

We recommend further studies of miRNA 21 in HCC patients to further evaluate miRNA 21 efficacy in detection of AFP-negative HCC cases as well as further studies of miRNA 21 in HCC patients with considering gender to detect if there is difference in its value between male and female sex and to detect performance of miRNA 21 in metastatic HCC as well as staging of HCC.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

References

  1. Irshad M, Gupta P, Irshad K (2017) Molecular basis of hepatocellular carcinoma induced by hepatitis C virus infection. World J Hepatol 9(36):1305–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Christian-Miller N, Frenette C (2018) Hepatocellular cancer pain: impact and management challenges. J Hepatocellular Carcinoma 5:75-80. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S145450

  3. Zhang ZQ, Meng H, Wang N et al (2014) Serum microRNA 143 and microRNA 215 as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Pathol 9:135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Volk ML, Hernandez JC, Su GL, Lok AS et al (2007) Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma may impair the performance of biomarkers: a comparison of AFP, DCP, and AFP-L3. Cancer Biomark 3:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berretta M, Cavaliere C, Alessandrini L et al (2017) Serum and tissue markers in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical and prognostic. Oncotarget 8(8):14192–14220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Z, Zhang X, Wang G, et al (2014) H. Role of MicroRNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepat Mon 14:e18672.

  7. Oksuz Z, Serin MS, Kaplan E et al (2015) Serum micro RNAs; miR-30c-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-302c-3p and miR-17-5p could be used as novel non-invasive biomarkers for HCV-positive cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. MolBiol Rep 42:713–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujita Y, Kuwano K, Ochiya T et al (2014) The impact of extracellular vesicle-encapsulated circulating microRNAs in lung cancer research. Biomed Res Int 2014:486413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caviglia JM, Yan J, Jang M-K, et al (2018) MicroRNA-21 and Dicer are dispensable for hepatic stellate cell activation and the development of liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2018;00(00). https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29627

  10. Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics102: Quantitative Data – Parametric & Non-parametric Tests. Singapore Med J 44(8):391–396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abd-Elsalam S, Elwan N, Soliman H et al (2018) Epidemiology of liver cancer in Nile delta over a decade: A single-center study. South Asian J Cancer 7:24–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsayes KM, Kielar AZ, Chernyak V et al (2019) LI-RADS : a conceptual and historical review from its beginning to its recent integration into AASLD clinical practice guidance 2019:49–69

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Tan Z, Hu H et al (2019) MicroRNA-21 promotes breast cancer proliferation and metastasis by targeting LZTFL1. BMC Cancer 19(1):738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu RH, Ning B, Ma XE et al (2016) Regulatory roles of microRNA-21 in fibrosis through interaction with diverse pathways. Mol Med Rep 13(3):2359–2366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe K, Narumi T, Watanabe T et al (2020) The association between microRNA-21 and hypertension-induced cardiac remodeling. PLoS One 15(2):e0226053

  16. Guo X, Lv X, Lv X, Ma Y et al (2017) Circulating miR-21 serves as a serum biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma and correlated with distant metastasis. Oncotarget 8(27):44050–44058. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. El Gedawy G, Obada M, Kelani A et al (2017) Circulating MiRNA-21 and programed cell death (PDCD) 4 gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Egyptian patients. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 18(2):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmhg.2016.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karakatsanis A, Papaconstantinou I, Gazouli M et al (2013) Expression of microRNAs, miR-21, miR-31, miR-122, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-200c, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-223 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its prognostic significance. Mol Carcinog 52(4):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.21864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Demerdash HM, Hussien HM, Hassouna E et al (2017) Detection of microRNA in hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C genotype-4 in Egyptian patients. Biomed Res Int 2017:2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1806069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yi PS, Li JS (2018) High expression of miR-21 is not a predictor of poor prognosis in all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol 8(6):733–739. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2018.1603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hegazy AE, Fahim HH, Elhosary YA et al (2015) The potential role of miRNAs 21 and 199-a in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gene 575(1):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sacco R, Morisco F, Caturelli E et al (2014) Determinants of alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for its clinical use. Cancer 120(14):2150–2157. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai HJ, Hsieh MY, Tsai YC et al (2014) Liver function tests may be useful tools for advanced cancer patient care: a preliminary single-center result. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 30(3):146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2013.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen C-H, Wu S-S, Cheng K-S et al (2006) Long-term trends and geographic variations in the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 11 312 patients in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21(10):1561–1566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04425.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Changchien CS, Chen CL, Yen YH et al (2008) Analysis of 6381 hepatocellular carcinoma patients in southern Taiwan. Prognostic features, treatment outcome, and survival. J Gastroenterol 43(2):159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-007-2134-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bihrer V, Waidmann O, Friedrich-Rust M et al (2011) Serum microRNA-21 as marker for necroinflammation in hepatitis C patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 6(10):e26971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carr BI, Guerra V (2013) Thrombocytosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 58(6):1790–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson AI, Conroy KP, Henderson NC (2015) Hepatic stellate cells: central modulators of hepatic carcinogenesis. BMC Gastroenterol 5:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tornesello ML, Buonaguro L, Izzo F et al (2016) Molecular alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections. Oncotarget 7:25087–25102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. YAlmaz Y, E Erdal (2016) Platelets, Microenvironment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biochem Anal Biochem 5(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1009.1000281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carr BI, Guerra V, Giannini EG et al (2016) An HCC Aggressiveness Index and Blood GTP, Bilirubin and Platelet Levels. J Integr Oncol 5:172. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6771.1000172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Carr BI, Guerra V, Giannini EG et al (2014) Association of abnormal plasma bilirubin with aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype. Semin Oncol 41(2):252–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomimaru Y, Eguchi H, Nagano H et al (2016) Circulating microRNA-21 as a novel bio-marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56(1):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by Research Service from Faculty of Medicine Cairo University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Internal Medicine - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Maha Assem Hussein, Amal Fathy Mohammed Radwan & May Mohsen Fawzi

  2. Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology - Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Laila Ahmed Rashed

Authors
  1. Maha Assem Hussein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amal Fathy Mohammed Radwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. May Mohsen Fawzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laila Ahmed Rashed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eman Hassan Ahmed Ibrahim Saad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AF was responsible for the concept of the work. MF was responsible for the interpretation of the data. LR was responsible for the laboratory investigations. EH was responsible for collecting the data and its analysis. MA was responsible for drafting the work and its revision. The authors  have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maha Assem Hussein.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Cairo University ethical committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Also, a consent was obtained from all participants for publication. Reference number is I-210316.

Consent for publications

All the authors approved.

Competing interests

The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussein, M.A., Radwan, A.F.M., Fawzi, M.M. et al. MicroRNA 21as a novel biomarker in hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Egypt J Intern Med 34, 56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-022-00136-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-022-00136-6

Keywords