Skip to main content

Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors

Abstract

Introduction

Early detection of renal dysfunction in live kidney donors is important and needs easy reliable tools. The aim of the study is to evaluate the cystatin level and cystatin-based equation in assessment of renal function in old healthy kidney donors.

Participants and methods

A total of 27 living kidney donors were selected in the study, where serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured. Measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was done by DTPA renal scintigraphy, and it was estimated by the following equations: Cockroft–Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-based creatinine, cystatin, and creatinine–cystatin formulae.

Results

A total of 27 kidney donors comprised 12 (44.4%) males and 15 (55.6%) females. The mean±SD age was 61±0.14 years, and mean±SD age at the time of donation was 56.9±1.7 years. The mean of cystatin level was 1.28±0.44. Serum cystatin was negatively correlated with measured filtration rate by renal scintigraphy and estimating GFR by cystatin and creatinine–cystatin formulae. The performance of Cockroft–Gault equation was better, with the highest sensitivity (70%). Serum cystatin and cystatin-based equation had higher specificity (70%) at criterion of 1.4 and 48, respectively. Area under the curve was 0.204 and 0.839, respectively, and significance level was 0.002 and 0.009, respectively.

Conclusion

Serum cystatin and cystatin-based formulae could outperform as surrogate tools to monitor the renal function and estimating GFR in healthy older kidney donors. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-based cystatin has better specificity, whereas Cockroft–Gault equation has better sensitivity with the best accuracy.

References

  1. Pauly R, Gill JS, Rose C, Asad R, Chery A, Pierratos A, et al. Survival among nocturnal haemodialysis patients compared to kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24:2915–2919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ommen ES, Winston JA, Murphy B. Medical risks in living kidney donors: absence of proof is not proof of absence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1:885–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherikh SW, Young JC, Kramer FB, Taranto ES, Randall HB, Fan PY. Ethnic and gender related differences in the risk of end-stage renal disease after living kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:1650–1655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sommerer C, Morath C, Andrassy J, Zeier M. The long-term consequences of living-related or unrelated kidney donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19(Suppl 4):45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey R, Guo H, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:459–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Budisavljevic MN, Nietert PJ, Zhai Y, Dooley MJ, Rajagopalan PR. Long-term effects of kidney donation on renal function and blood pressure in African Americans. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6:1474–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Elinder CG, Stenbeck M, Groth CG. Kidney donors live longer. Transplantation 1997; 64: 976–978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nogueira JM, Weir MR, Jacobs S, Haririan A, Breault D, Klassen D, et al. A study of renal outcomes in African American living kidney donors. Transplantation 2009; 88:1371–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han HH, Choi KH, Yang SC, Han WK. Clinical assessment of follow-up cystatin C-based eGFR in live kidney donors. Korean J Urol 2012; 53:721–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murty M, Sharma UK, Pandey VB, Kankare SB. Serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function in detection of early acute kidney injury. Indian J Nephrol 2013; 23:180–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamurthy N, Arumugasamy K, Anand U, Anand CV, Aruna V, Venu G. Serum cystatin C levels in renal transplant recipients. Indian J Clin Biochem 2011; 26:120–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogawa Y, Goto T, Tamasawa N, Matsui J, Tando Y, Sugimoto K, et al. Serum cystatin C in diabetic patients: not only an indicator for renal dysfunction in patients with overt nephropathy but also a predictor for cardiovascular events in patients without nephropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008; 79:357–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Westhuyzen J. Cystatin C: a promising marker and predictor of impaired renal function. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2006; 36:387–394.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Filler G, Bökenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martínez-Brú C, Grubb A. Cystatin C as a marker of GFR – history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem 2005; 38:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashalatha VL, Bitla AR, Kumar VS, Rajasekhar D, Suchitra MM, Lakshmi AY, et al. Biomarker response to contrast administration in diabetic and nondiabetic patients following coronary angiography. Indian J Nephrol 2017; 27:20–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013; 3:1–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Y, Kim KY, Hwang I, Yim W, Do M, Kim S, et al. Cystatin C-based equation for predicting the glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2017; 49:1018–1022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Covarrubias L, Barragan J, Castro I, Hernandez K, Reding A, Hinojosa H, et al. Correlation of the glomerular filtration rate measured with the use of DTPA-Tc99m in live kidney donors with equations based on creatinine and cystatin C. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:423–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16:31–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 55:622–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150:604–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:20–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fink JC, Blahut SA, Weir MR. Optimal strategies for modeling the reciprocal of creatinine versus time in renal transplant recipients and patients with native chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39:753–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA (stannous). Am J Roentgenol 1882; 138:565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hasan S, Ali A, Jawad F, Ahmed E, Asghar A, Naqi Z, et al. living kidney donor follow-up in a dedicated clinic. Transplantation 2005; 79:1247–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Issa N, Kukla A, Jackson S, Riad M, Foster M, Matas A, et al. Comparison of cystatin C and creatinine-based equations for GFR estimation after living kidney donation. Transplantation 2014; 98:871–877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ayub S, Khan S, Ozair U, Zafar MN. Cystatin C levels in healthy kidney donors and its correlation with GFR by creatinine clearance. J Pak Med Assoc 2014; 64:286–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spruill JW, Wade EW, Cobb HH. Continuing the use of the Cockcroft-Gault equation for drug dosing in patients with impaired renal function. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 86:468–470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Michels WM, Grootendorst DC, Verduijn M, Elliott EG, Dekker FW, Krediet RT. Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and new CKD-EPI formulas in relation to GFR, age, and body size. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:1003–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen MT, Maynard S, Kimmel PL. Misapplications of commonly used kidney equations: renal physiology in practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:528–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hari P, Bagga A, Mahajan P, Lakshmy R. Effect of malnutrition on serum creatinine and cystatin C levels. Pediatr Nephrol 2007; 22:1757–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. John GT, Fleming JJ, Talaulikar GS, Selvakumar R, Thomas PP, Jacob CK. Measurement of renal function in kidney donors using serum cystatin C and beta(2)-microglobulin. Ann Clin Biochem 2003; 40:656–658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harman G, White CA, Ramsay T, Kokolo MB, Craig J, Knoll GA. Accuracy of cystatin C-based estimates of glomerular fi ltration rate in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28:741–57. 32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Santos J, Martins L. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker. World J Nephrol 2015; 4:345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaisuresh K, Sharma R, Mehrothra S, Kumari N, Singh Badauria D, Gupta A, et al. Cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate in voluntary kidney donors. Exp Clin Transplant 2012; 10:14–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Liang L, Gerald J, Marshall M, et al. Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels. Kidney Int 2009; 75:652–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Alwakeel J, Ali Memon N, Chaudhary A, Mitwalli A, Tarif N, Isnani A, et al. Normal reference levels of serum cystatin C in Saudi adults. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant 2008; 19:361–370.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Qutb A, Syed G, Tamim HM, Al Jondeby M, Jaradat M, Tamimi W, et al. Cystatin C-based formula is superior to MDRD, Cockcroft–Gault and Nankivell formulae in estimating the glomerular filtration rate in renal allografts. Exp Clin Transplant 2009; 7:197–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Y. Ali.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A.Y., Elkhashab, S.O. Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors. Egypt J Intern Med 31, 185–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejim.ejim_99_18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejim.ejim_99_18

Keywords