Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Detection of fundic varices obturation by endoscopic ultrasound versus multidetector computed tomography

Abstract

Background

Gastroesophageal varices (GVs) present in 50% of patients with liver cirrhosis. GVs bleed at a rate of 5–15%, and the 6-week mortality after hemorrhage is 20%. GVs are treated with a tissue adhesive, cyanoacrylate, where repeated sessions are performed 2–4 weeks until obliteration, and eradication is achieved with 2–4 injections using 1–2 ml/ session. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was found superior to endoscopy in detecting gastric varices. Gastric varices obturation can be detected using CD-EUS to assess blood flow in variceal lumen after cyanoacrylate injection. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is an acceptable imaging modality for abdominal vascular system and assessment of endoscopic therapy of fundal varices. To our knowledge, there is no study for detecting GV obturation yet. The aim of this study to compare between EUS and MDCT in detecting obturation of GV and comparing EUS and upper endoscopy in detection of GV obturation.

Patients and methods

A total of 22 patients with liver cirrhosis presented with acute GV bleeding for the first time, which was confirmed and managed by upper endoscopy, being carried out in the first 12h after admission. Then the patients were subjected to monthly gastric varices injection of cyanoacrylate until they appeared to be obturated by upper endoscopy using blunt end of injection catheter sheath to palpate varices. After that EUS and CT were done for evaluation of GV, in addition to perigastric and paragastric collaterals.

Results

EUS is superior to CT in detecting GV obliteration, with a high significant difference (P=0.04), whereas EUS and upper endoscopy have similar results in detecting the obliteration of GV (P=0.68). There was a statistically significant association between splenic size and GV obliteration (P=0.002) and a significant negative correlation between size of paragastric collaterals and GV obturation.

Conclusion

EUS is superior to CT in detecting the obliteration of GV.

References

  1. Haq I, Tripathi D. Recent advances in the management of variceal bleeding. Gastroenterol Rep 2017; 5:113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2254–2261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology 1992; 16:1343–1349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia-Pagán JC, Barrufet M, Cardenas A, et al. Management of gastric varices. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:919–928.e911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caldwell S, Hespenheide EE, Greenwald B, Northup PG, Patrie JT. Enbucrilate for gastric varices: extended experience in 92 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 2007; 26:49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 46:922–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Pagán JC, Caca K, Bureau C, Laleman W, Appenrodt B, Luca A, et al. Early use of tips inpatients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. New Engl J Med 2010; 362:2370–2379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hashizume MKS, Sugimachi K, Sueishi K. Three-dimensional view of the vascular structure of the lower esophagus in clinical portal hypertension. Hepatology 1988; 8:1482–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang A-J, Li B-M, Zheng X-L, Shu X, Zhu X. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of esophagogastric varices. Endosc Ultrasound 2016; 5:218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatia V. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for esophageal and gastric varices: How can it improve the outcomes and reduce complications of glue injection. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2012; 2:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Böhm T, Pfammatter T, Seifert B, Marincek B, et al. Detection of submucosal gastric fundal varices with multi-detector row ct angiography. Gut 2003; 52:886–892.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60:646–649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sgouros S, Bergele C, Avgerinos A. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension. Where are we next? Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38:289–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhat YM, Weilert F, Fredrick RT, Kane SD, Shah JN, Hamerski CM, et al. Eus-guided treatment of gastric fundal varices with combined injection of coils and cyanoacrylate glue: a large us experience over 6 years (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83:1164–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Merkel C, Gatta A, Arnaboldi L, Zuin R. Splenic haemodynamics and portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis and spleen enlargement. Clin Physiol 1985; 5:531–539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Arena U, Abraldes JG, Vizzutti F, García-Pagán JC, et al. Elastography, spleen size, and platelet count identify portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013; 144:102–111.e101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Procopet B, Berzigotti A. Diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: Imaging, non-invasive markers of fibrosis and liver biopsy. Gastroenterol Rep 2017; 5:79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim MY, Um SH, Baik SK, Seo YS, Park SY, Lee JI, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of gastric variceal bleeding: retrospective Korean multicenter data. Clin Mol Hepatol 2013; 19:36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kovalak M, Lake J, Mattek N, Eisen G, Lieberman D, Zaman A. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhotic patients: data from a national endoscopicdatabase. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosch J, Thabut D, Albillos A, Carbonell N, Spicak J, Massard J, et al. Recombinant factor viia for variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2008; 47:1604–1614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Okasha HH, Ramadan F, El-Saadany M, Naga MI, El-Badri A, Fouda A, et al. Endosonography as a predictive tool for first oesophagogastric variceal bleeding. Arab J Gastroenterol 2010; 11:149–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosli MH, Aljudaibi B, Almadi M, Marotta P. The safety and efficacy of gastric fundal variceal obliteration using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate; the experience of a single canadian tertiary care centre. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwase H, Suga S, Morise K, Kuroiwa A, Yamaguchi T, Horiuchi Y, et al. Color doppler endoscopic ultrasonography for the evaluation of gastric varices and endoscopic obliteration with cyanoacrylate glue. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41:150–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee YT, Chan FK, Ng EK, Leung VK, Law KB, Yung MY, et al. Eus-guided injection of cyanoacrylate for bleeding gastric varices. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52:168–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarin SK, Kumar A. Endoscopic treatment of gastric varices. Clin Liver Dis 2014; 18:809–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cui Z, Feng Z, Yang H, Jiang H, Qi W, Feng W, et al. Mo1562 evaluation of esophageal and gastric varices by ct portal venography for prophylactic endoscopic therapy of variceal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: AB467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amr Elrabat.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elrabat, A., El-Gamal, S., Kashwaa, M.M. et al. Detection of fundic varices obturation by endoscopic ultrasound versus multidetector computed tomography. Egypt J Intern Med 31, 487–494 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejim.ejim_57_19

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejim.ejim_57_19

Keywords