Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Updated ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in risk stratification of thyroid nodules: 1-year experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Al-Qassim

Abstract

Background

Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) is assessment of risk stratification of thyroid nodules, using a score. A novel ACR (American College of Radiology) TI-RADS has been recently suggested by American College of Radiology. But, the utility of ACR TI-RADS in risk stratification for thyroid lesion needs further evaluation.

Aim

Of this study was to evaluate ACR TI-RADS classification in discriminating benign and from other thyroid lesions as detected by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).

Methods

This retrospective study included all patients referred to our institute for FNAC of a thyroid nodule over 1 year. Thyroid nodules were categorized according to the 2017 ACR TI-RADS. Ultimately, efficacy of ACR TI-RADS in differentiating benign from non-benign nodules was assessed using ROC curve, cross-tabulation, and Chisquare tests. According to the results of FNAC, nodules were classified into 2 groups; benign lesions (Bethesda II) and malignant lesions (Bethesda IV, V).

Results

The percentages of Bethesda IV and V lesions defined in our ACR-TIRADS were as follows: ACR TI-RADS 1, 2 (0%), ACR TI-RADS 3 (4%), ACR TI-RADS 4 (6.6%), and ACR TI-RADS 5 (22.6%). ROC curve analysis for ACR TI-RADS to differentiate benign from non-benign pathology showed (AUC 0.60, 95% CI: 0.505–0.713). ACR TI-RADS had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value 75%, 62.35 %, 15.7%, 96.3% respectively.

Conclusion

Differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid lesion can be suggested from the ultrasound based ACR TI-RADS system. FNAC might be deferred in patients having ACR TI-RADS 1 and 2.

References

  1. Han XT, Yang Y, Peng B, CHEN Q. Thyroid nodule ultrasound image feature extraction technique based on TI-RADS. Comput Sci 2015; 42:126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ardakani AA, Gharbali A, Mohammadi A. Classification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules using wavelet texture analysis of sonograms. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34:1983–1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow LS, Gharib H, Goellner JR, van Heerden JA. Nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: management dilemmas. Thyroid 2001; 11:1147–1151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon JH, Lee HS, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kwak JY. Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: comparison between the thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the 2014 American Thyroid Association management guidelines. Radiology 2016; 278:917–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duan HM, Zhang TS, Chun-hua L, Jiahui W, Lihong W. Diagnostic value of ultrasound TI-RADS classification of thyroid cancer. Pract Med 2015; 20:3391–3394.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vargas-Uricoechea H, Meza-Cabrera I, Herrera-Chaparro J. Concordance between the TIRADS ultrasound criteria and the Bethesda cytology criteria on the nontoxic thyroid nodule. Thyroid Res 2017; 10:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, Franco C, Niedmann JP, Castro A, Dominguez M. et al... An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:1748–1751.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2017; 27:1341–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong YJ, Son EJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Hong SW, Chang HS. Positive predictive values of sonographicfeatures of solid thyroid nodule. Clin Imaging 2010; 34:127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DW, Lee EJ, Jung SJ, Ryu JH, Kim YM. Role of sonographic diagnosis in managing Bethesda class III nodules. Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:2136–2141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim DW, Lee YJ, Eom JW, Jung SJ, Ha TK, Kang T, et al. Ultrasound-based diagnosis for solid thyroid nodules with the largest diameter <5 mm. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39:1190–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, et al. Thyroid Study Group, Korean Society of Neuro- and Head and Neck Radiology. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008; 247:762–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Kim MJ. Partially cystic thyroid nodules on ultrasound: Probability of malignancy and sonographic differentiation. Thyroid 2009; 19:341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park JY, Lee HJ, Jang HW, Kim HK, Yi JH, Lee W, Kim SH. A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2009; 19:1257–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frates MC, Benson CB, Charboneau JW, Cibas ES, Clark OH, Coleman BG, et al. Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in US consensus conference statement. Radiology 2005; 237:794–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Son EJ, Park SH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk. Int J Med Radiol 2011; 260:892.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yunus M, Ahmed Z. Significance of ultrasound features in predicting malignant solid thyroid nodules: need for fine-needle aspiration. J Pak Med Assoc 2010; 60:848–853.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frasoldati A, Valcavi R. Challenges in neck ultrasonography: lymphadenopathy and parathyroid glands. Endocr Pract 2004; 10:261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohanty J, Sanket XX, Mishra P. Role of ACR-TIRADS in risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Int J Res Med Sci 2019; 7:1039–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chandramohan A, Khurana A, Pushpa BT, Manipadam MT, Naik D, Thomas N, Abraham D, Paul MJ. Is TIRADS a practical and accurate system for use in daily clinical practice?. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26:145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mervat Naguib MD.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ewid, M., Naguib, M., Alamer, A. et al. Updated ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in risk stratification of thyroid nodules: 1-year experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Al-Qassim. Egypt J Intern Med 31, 868–873 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejim.ejim_143_19

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejim.ejim_143_19

Keywords