Skip to main content

Seroprevalence and real-time PCR study of Epstein—Barr virus and the value of screening in pretransplant patients

Abstract

Objective

This study was performed to estimate the prevalence of Epstein–Barr virus immunoglobulin M virus capsid antigen (EBV IgM VCA) among healthy blood donors and to confirm the real risk of transfusion transmission by detection of virus load using PCR quantification.

Materials and methods

A total of 860 apparently healthy Egyptian blood donors were enrolled and tested for EBV IgM VCA. Quantitative PCR was performed for reactive cases for EBV IgM VCA.

Results

An overall 38 patients were reactive for EBV IgM VCA, constituting 4.4% of the sample. Reactivity of Epstein–Barr virus did not differ significantly as regards sex distribution, blood grouping, Rh factor positivity, and hemoglobin level, but it was significantly higher among upper Egypt participants than among those from other regions (P = 0.006). There was a very high statistically significant positive correlation between the titer of EBV VCA IgM reactive cases and age in the studied group (P = 0.0001 and r = 0.6). PCR was negative for all of the reactive cases.

Conclusion

Routine screening for Epstein–Barr virus in blood bags is not economical. Screening is highly recommended only for immunocompromised and pretransplant patients. Viremia is not the role in individuals with EBV IgM positive sera, which in turn changes some concepts in organ transplantation.

References

  1. Young LS, Rickinson AB. Epstein–Barr virus: 40 years on. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4: 757–768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein MA, Achong BG. The EB virus. Annu Rev Microbiol 1973; 27: 413–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rickinson, AB, Kieff E. Epstein–Barr virus. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. Fields virology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. 2575–2627.

  4. Carbone A, Gloghinia A, Dotti G. EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders: classification and treatment. Oncologist 2008; 5: 577–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spano JP, Busson P, Atlan D, Bourhis J, Pignon JP, Esteban C, Armand JP. Nasopharyngeal carcinomas: an update. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2121–2135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung SF, Zee B, Ma BB, Hui EP, Mo F, Lai M, et al. Plasma Epstein–Barr viral deoxyribonucleic acid quantitation complements tumornode-metastasis staging prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5414–5418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. To EW, Chan KC, Leung SF, Chan LY, To KF, Chan AT, et al. Rapid clearance of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA after surgical treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 3254–3259.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan KC, Lo YM. Circulating EBV DNA as a tumor marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol 2002; 12: 489–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Beek J, zur Hausen A, Kranenbarg EK, Warring RJ, Bloemena E, Craanen ME, et al. A rapid and reliable enzyme immunoassay PCR-based screening method to identify EBV-carrying gastric carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2002; 15: 870–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung BK, Tsai K, Allan LL, Zheng DJ, Nie JC, Biggs CM, et al. Innate immune control of EBV-infected B cells by invariant natural killer T cells. Blood 2013; 122: 2600–2608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rezk SA, Weiss LM. Epstein–Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disorders. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 1293–1304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes DP, Brink AA, Vervoort MB, Middeldorp JM, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ Expression of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) transcripts encoding homologues to important human proteins in diverse EBV associated diseases. Mol Pathol 1999; 52: 97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hess RD. Routine Epstein–Barr virus diagnostics from the laboratory perspective: still challenging after 35 years: J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 3381–3387.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans AS, Rothfield NF, Niederman JC. Raised antibody titres to E.B. virus in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 1971; 1: 167–168.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pender MP. Infection of autoreactive B lymphocytes with EBV, causing chronic autoimmune diseases Trends Immunol 2003; 24: 584–588

  16. Kannangai R, Sachithanandham J, Kandathil AJ, Ebenezer DL, Danda D, Vasuki Z, et al. Immune responses to Epstein–Barr virus in individuals with systemic and organ specific autoimmune disorders. Indian J Med Microbiol 2010; 28: 120–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bembde AS, Mahajan NA, Bhale CP, Mulay SS. Prevalence of transfusion transmitted viral diseases among blood donors in MGM Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra. IJSHR 2013; 3: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trottier H, Buteau C, Robitaille N, Duval M, Tucci M, Lacroix J, Alfieri C. Transfusion-related Epstein–Barr virus infection among stem cell transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study in children. Transfusion. 2012; 52: 2653–2663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moor AC, Dubbelman TM, VanSteveninck J, Brand A. Transfusion-transmitted diseases: risks, prevention and perspectives. Eur J Haematol 1999; 62: 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McQuiston JH, Childs JE, Chamberland ME, Tabor E. Transmission of tick-borne agents of disease by blood transfusion: a review of known and potential risks in the United States. Transfusion 2000; 40: 274–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blajchman MA. Reducing the risk of bacterial contamination of cellular blood components. Advances in Transfusion Safety, Dev Biol 1999; 102: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gulley ML, Tang W. Using Epstein–Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 350–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holmes RD, Sokol RJ. Epstein–Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Pediatr Transplant 2002; 6: 456–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alfieri C, Tanner J, Carpentier L, Perpête C, Savoie A, Paradis K, et al. Epstein–Barr virus transmission from a blood donor to an organ transplant recipient with recovery of the same virus strain from the recipient’s blood and oropharynx. Blood 1996; 87: 812–817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lennette ET. Epstein–Barr virus. In: Lennette EH, Lennette DA, Lennette ET, eds. Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial & chlamydial infections. 7th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995. 299–312.

  26. Babel N, Gabdrakhmanova L, Hammer M, Rosenberger C, Oppert M, Volk HD, Reinke P. Induction of pre-transplant Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection by donor blood transfusion in EBV-seronegative recipients may reduce risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in adolescent renal transplant patients: report of two cases. Transpl Infect Dis 2005; 7: 133–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mishra B, Mohan B, Ratho RK. Heterophile antibody positive infectious mononucleosis. Indian J Pediatr 2004; 71: 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller LE. The lab and Epstein–Barr virus infections. ADVANCE for Medical Laboratory Professionals; 2002: 19–21.

  29. Figueira-Silva CM, Pereira FEL. Prevalence of Epstein–Barr virus antibodies in healthy children and adolescents in Victory, State of Espirito Santo, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2004: 37: 5.

  30. Hudnall SD, Chen T, Allison P, Tyring SK, Heath A. Herpesvirus prevalence and viral load in healthy blood donors by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Transfusion 2008: 48: 1180–1187.

  31. Chiavetta JA, Maki E, Gula CA, Newman A. Estimated risk of transfusion transmitted infection in the Canadian blood supply. Vox Sang 2000; 78: P360.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Qu L, Xu S, Rowe D, Triulzi D. Efficacy of Epstein–Barr virus removal by leukoreduction of red blood cells. Transfusion 2005; 45: 591–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wagner HJ, Klüter H, Kruse A, Kirchner H. Relevance of transmission of Epstein–Barr virus through blood transfusion. Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed 1994; 32: : 138–141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cervia JS, Wenz B, Ortolano GA. Leukocyte reduction’s role in the attenuation of infection risks among transfusion recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 1008–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gartzonika C, Vrioni G, Priavali E, Pappas G, Levidiotou S. Utility of real-time PCR in the diagnosis of primary Epstein–Barr virus infection. J Med Microb Diagn 2012; 2: 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bauer, G. Simplicity through complexity: immunoblot with recombinant antigens as the new gold standard in Epstein–Barr virus serology. Clin Lab 2001; 47: 223–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gärtner BC, Kortmann K, Schäfer M, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Sester U, Kaul H, Pees H. No correlation in Epstein–Barr virus reactivation between serological parameters and viral load. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan KH, Ng MH, Seto WH, Peiris JS. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA in sera of patients with primary EBV infection. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 4152–4154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Luderer R, Kok M, Niesters HG, Schuurman R, de Weerdt O, Thijsen SF. Real-time Epstein–Barr virus PCR for the diagnosis of primary EBV infections and EBV reactivation. Mol Diagn 2005; 9: 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mouritsen CL, Wittwer CT, Reed G, Khan TM, Martins TB, Jaskowski TD, et al. Detection of Epstein–Barr viral DNA in serum using rapid-cycle PCR. Biochem Mol Med 1997; 60: 161–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lazda VA. Evaluation of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) antibody screening of organ donors for allocation of organs to EBV serostatus matched recipients. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 3404–3405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Hamdy MD.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elansary, M., El Haddad, H.E., Eldin, U.A.A.S. et al. Seroprevalence and real-time PCR study of Epstein—Barr virus and the value of screening in pretransplant patients. Egypt J Intern Med 28, 9–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-7782.182947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-7782.182947

Keywords