Table 4 Comparison between AML with M1 subtype with high (> 0.64) DANCR (n = 16), and remaining AML patients with low (< 0.64) DANCR (n = 30) in relation to their response to treatment
2−ΔΔct DANCR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low (≤ 0.64) (n = 30) | AML M1 High (> 0.64) (n = 16) | Test of Sig | p | |||
No | % | No | % | |||
Response to treatment | ||||||
Partial remission | 2 | 6.7 | 1 | 6.3 | χ2 = 0.003 | FEp = 1.000 |
Complete remission | 5 | 16.7 | 4 | 25.0 | χ2 = 0.460 | FEp = 0.698 |
Refractory | 11 | 36.7 | 1 | 6.3 | χ2 = 5.007* | FEp = 0.035* |
Died | 9 | 30.0 | 7 | 43.8 | χ2 = 0.870 | 0.351 |
Lost in Follow-up | 3 | 10.0 | 3 | 18.8 | χ2 = 0.704 | FEp = 0.405 |